Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32086660›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2020

Does valence influence perceptual bias towards incongruence during binocular rivalry?

Angel Anna Zacharia, Navdeep Ahuja, Simran Kaur, Nalin Mehta, Ratna Sharma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angel Anna ZachariaStress and Cognitive Electroimaging Laboratory, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Navdeep AhujaStress and Cognitive Electroimaging Laboratory, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Simran KaurStress and Cognitive Electroimaging Laboratory, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Nalin MehtaStress and Cognitive Electroimaging Laboratory, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Ratna SharmaStress and Cognitive Electroimaging Laboratory, Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029, India. ratnaaiims@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-3514

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficient processing of complex visual environments is essential for effective functioning. In the natural environment, processing the context is as important as the processing of the target object since no object can be found in isolation. Congruent object-context associations in a visual scene facilitate object recognition, whereas incongruent associations decrease performance accuracy. Although there is a performance reduction, incongruent scenes are reported to have a perceptual bias due to the reallocation of the attentional resources towards the associated semantic conflict. Another key attribute that prepares the visual system to identify the important aspects of the environment is valence, and any visual scene can be classified into one of the three valence categories. Hence, the current study was designed to investigate how valence influences the perceptual bias towards incongruent object-context associations. An intermittent binocular rivalry task was used to measure the perceptual bias across valence categories. The results revealed a significant predominance of incongruent pictures when the associated valence was negative and neutral and remained unbiased for positive valence. We propose a valence-congruency interaction in which perceptual bias towards incongruence is greatly influenced by valence.

Indexed as

AttentionPattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultBinocular rivalryIncongruencyValenceVisual perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.