ArticleCognitive processing2020
Does valence influence perceptual bias towards incongruence during binocular rivalry?
Article in Cognitive processing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered functional connectivity: A possible reason for reduced performance during visual cognition involving scene incongruence and negative affect.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2022Article
- You won't believe what this guy is doing with the potato: The ObjAct stimulus-set depicting human actions on congruent and incongruent objects.Behavior research methods · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficient processing of complex visual environments is essential for effective functioning. In the natural environment, processing the context is as important as the processing of the target object since no object can be found in isolation. Congruent object-context associations in a visual scene facilitate object recognition, whereas incongruent associations decrease performance accuracy. Although there is a performance reduction, incongruent scenes are reported to have a perceptual bias due to the reallocation of the attentional resources towards the associated semantic conflict. Another key attribute that prepares the visual system to identify the important aspects of the environment is valence, and any visual scene can be classified into one of the three valence categories. Hence, the current study was designed to investigate how valence influences the perceptual bias towards incongruent object-context associations. An intermittent binocular rivalry task was used to measure the perceptual bias across valence categories. The results revealed a significant predominance of incongruent pictures when the associated valence was negative and neutral and remained unbiased for positive valence. We propose a valence-congruency interaction in which perceptual bias towards incongruence is greatly influenced by valence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32086660What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.