Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32086550›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2020

[Pain concepts in fast-track endoprosthetics].

G von Lewinski, C Weber, L-R Tücking

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Fast-Track-Arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G von LewinskiKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099, Göttingen, Deutschland. gabriela.lewinski@med.uni-goettingen.de.
C WeberOrthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im DIAKOVERE Annastift, Hannover, Deutschland.
L-R TückingOrthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im DIAKOVERE Annastift, Hannover, Deutschland.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An effective and safe pain management is nowadays a pivotal component of fast-track endoprosthetics. The analgesic strategies should be opioid-sparing whenever possible because opioids induce side-effects that reduce the well-being of patients and are even associated with a risk of falling. This is not compatible with a fast mobilization. In order to achieve this goal, multimodal pain concepts have proven to be suitable. Decentralized analgesia with epidural and regional catheters as well as the use of local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) can be used; however, catheters are also associated with a muscular deficit and the danger of falling. Therefore, in the fast-track concepts LIA has become established. With respect to knee endoprosthetics many studies have shown that LIA achieves at least comparable results or even superiority in comparison with the use of catheters. It represents a safe and effective procedure with respect to postoperative analgesia and accelerated mobilization. A variety of protocols for the use of LIA can currently be found in the literature. In addition to analgesics the supportive administration of glucocorticoids is increasingly being used, which also reduce pain due to the anti-inflammatory effect; however, regarding this aspect relatively few prospective randomized studies in comparison to LIA are available in the literature.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneePain ManagementAnalgesicsAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalHumansPostoperative PainProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsAnesthetics, LocalDecentralized analgesiaFreedom from painLocal infiltration anesthesiaMobilizationMultimodal pain management

Identifiers

PMID32086550
OpenAlexW3007795804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.