Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32086436›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

Evaluating the effect of hospital setting on outcomes for neonatal abstinence syndrome.

Matthew R Grossman, Adam K Berkwitt, Rachel R Osborn, Brett V Citarella, Daniela Hochreiter, Matthew J Bizzarro

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew R GrossmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. matthe.grossman@yale.edu.
Adam K BerkwittDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Rachel R OsbornDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Brett V CitarellaDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Daniela HochreiterDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Matthew J BizzarroDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the impact of hospital setting on outcomes for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. STUDY

designWe conducted a retrospective study in two hospitals and three different hospital units. The inpatient group (n = 60) was managed on general inpatient floors, the NICU group (n = 50) was managed primarily in an NICU, and the combination group (n = 49) was managed in both NICU and inpatient units. The primary outcome was length of stay. Secondary outcomes included breastfeeding rates, morphine usage rates, and hospital costs.

resultsThe length of stay in the inpatient group (8.5 days) was significantly lower than the combination group (18 days) and NICU group (23 days) (p < 0.01). The inpatient group had significantly lower rates of morphine treatment and hospital costs with no difference in breastfeeding rates.

conclusionsInfants with neonatal abstinence syndrome had a significantly shorter length of stay and less use of morphine when managed on inpatient units versus NICU.

Indexed as

Neonatal Abstinence SyndromeHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayMorphineRetrospective StudiesMorphine

Identifiers

PMID32086436
OpenAlexW3008932925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.