Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32086358›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Tackling frailty at primary care: evaluation of the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention through a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.

Francisco Rivas-Ruiz, Mónica Machón, Maider Mateo-Abad, Eugenio Contreras-Fernández, Carolina Güell, Luis Baro-Rodríguez, Kalliopi Vrotsou, Raúl Quirós-López, Itziar Vergara, InFrAP investigators

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Age-Related Frailty: A Clinical Model for Geroscience?The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco Rivas-RuizUnidad de Investigación, Agencia Sanitaria Costa del Sol, Marbella, Málaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8894-0501
Mónica MachónRed de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain monica.machonsobrado@osakidetza.eus.
Maider Mateo-AbadRed de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.
Eugenio Contreras-FernándezRed de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.
Carolina GüellInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biodonostia, Grupo de Atención Primaria, San Sebastián, Spain.
Luis Baro-RodríguezÁrea del Medicamento, Distrito Sanitario de Atencion Primaria Costa del Sol, Mijas, Spain.
Kalliopi VrotsouRed de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.
Raúl Quirós-LópezRed de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.
Itziar VergaraRed de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9671-7898
InFrAP investigators
Biogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESAgencia Sanitaria Costa del Sol · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis project focuses on how frailty is addressed in primary healthcare (PHC) and will evaluate the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention (considering the appropriateness of the pharmaceutical prescription, the nutritional care provided and the exercise intervention) for persons with frailty, in terms of improving their functional capacity and reducing the incidence of adverse events related to frailty. The final evaluation will be made at 12 months' follow-up. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pragmatic multicentre cluster randomised controlled clinical trial, single blind with two arms: multifactorial intervention in PHC versus usual follow-up. The randomisation unit is the patient list and the analysis unit is the patient. In addition, a cost-effectiveness study and a qualitative study will be carried out, the latter based on semistructured interviews and focus groups. Two hundred persons (100 per study branch) all aged ≥70 years, presenting frailty, but functionally independent and resident in the community, will be recruited. A baseline evaluation will be carried out prior to the intervention, with follow-up at 6 and 12 months. The main study variables considered will be functional capacity and incidence of adverse events; the secondary variables considered will be the patients' sociodemographic characteristics, nutritional status, level of physical activity and drug consumption, together with data on comorbidity, cognitive and affective status and health-related quality of life. Data will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle using a 5% significance level. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will at all times be conducted in strict accordance with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki and with the national legislation regulating patients' autonomy. All patients recruited will be asked to provide written informed consent before taking part in the clinical trial. On completion of the study, the principal investigator expects to publish the results of this research in a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17143761.

Indexed as

FrailtyPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind Methodclinical trialsgeriatric medicinepreventive medicineprimary care

Identifiers

PMID32086358
PMCPMC7045273
OpenAlexW3008825551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.