Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085760›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Noise after total knee arthroplasty has limited effect on joint awareness and patient-reported clinical outcomes: retrospective study.

Hiroto Taniguchi, Masafumi Itoh, Nobuyuki Yoshimoto, Junya Itou, Umito Kuwashima, Ken Okazaki

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06880497 (Monocentric, Randomized Study, Comparing Articular Noise and Its Perception Between Two Different Types of Total Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06880497 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Monocentric, Randomized Study, Comparing Articular Noise and Its Perception Between Two Different Types of Total Knee Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorElsanRan2025 to 2028Enrolled170ConditionsKnee Osteoarthristis, Knee Replacement Arthroplasty, Knee Replacement, TotalArmstotal knee arthroplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hiroto TaniguchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yachiyo Medical Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Chiba, Japan.
Masafumi ItohDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawadacho, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyuki YoshimotoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yachiyo Medical Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Chiba, Japan.
Junya ItouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawadacho, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Umito KuwashimaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawadacho, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken OkazakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, 8-1 Kawadacho, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan. okazaki.ken@twmu.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-8406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome patients complain of noise after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Controversy still exists on how the noise affects the clinical outcomes, including joint awareness, after TKA. The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) measures the clinical outcomes focusing on joint awareness after surgery. The Knee Society Scoring System-2011 (KSS-2011) includes questionnaires for satisfaction, expectation, and functional activities. The aim of this study is to clarify the relationship among FJS-12, KSS-2011, and the noise. Furthermore, the relationship between FJS-12 and KSS-2011 was validated.

methodsUsing FJS-12 and KSS-2011, 295 knees from 225 patients who underwent TKA were retrospectively evaluated. Noise perception was evaluated by a questionnaire with five grades, a method that follows the questionnaire form of FJS-12 ("Are you aware of the noise of your artificial joint?"; never, almost never, seldom, sometimes, mostly). Correlations among FJS-12, KSS-2011, and noise were analyzed. The patients were divided into four groups based on the mechanism of their implant [cruciate retaining, posterior stabilized, cruciate sacrificed, and bicruciate stabilized (BCS)]. FJS-12, KSS-2011, and noise were compared among the groups.

resultsA strong correlation was found between FJS-12 and total score of KSS-2011 (0.70; P < 0.001). FJS-12 correlated with KSS-2011 subcategories of "symptoms," "satisfaction," and "standard activities," with correlation coefficients at approximately 0.60. Noise had weak correlations with FJS-12 (0.28; P < 0.001) and KSS-2011 (0.20 P < 0.001). In comparing the TKA mechanisms, BCS had remarkably better KSS-2011 and greater movement range but worse noise scores.

conclusionsNoise perception after TKA had limited effect on joint awareness and clinical outcomes. FJS-12 correlated strongly with KSS-2011 and associated with satisfaction, residual symptoms, and daily activities, as assessed by KSS-2011 subscores.

trial registrationThis study was approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Tokyo Women's Medical University (approval number: 4681 on March 2, 2018).

Indexed as

AwarenessNoisePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesJoint awarenessNoisesPatient-reported outcome measuresPatient satisfactionTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32085760
PMCPMC7035734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.