Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085740›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Sepsis in cancer patients residing in Zimbabwe: spectrum of bacterial and fungal aetiologies and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.

Frank Chinowaita, Wendy Chaka, Tinashe K Nyazika, Tendai C Maboreke, Emmanuel Tizauone, Prichard Mapondera, Inam Chitsike, Andrew Z Cakana, Rooyen T Mavenyengwa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Frank ChinowaitaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe. fchinowaita@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7974-8278
Wendy ChakaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Tinashe K NyazikaMalawi-Liverpool-Welcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Tendai C MaborekeDepartment of Haematology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Emmanuel TizauoneDepartment of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Prichard MaponderaAfrican Society Laboratory Medicine, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Inam ChitsikeDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Andrew Z CakanaDepartment of Haematology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Rooyen T MavenyengwaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
University of Zimbabwe · ZWAfrican Society for Laboratory Medicine · ETRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer and sepsis comorbidity is a major public health problem in most parts of the world including Zimbabwe. The microbial aetiologies of sepsis and their antibiograms vary with time and locations. Knowledge on local microbial aetiologies of sepsis and their susceptibility patterns is critical in guiding empirical antimicrobial treatment choices.

methodsThis was a descriptive cross-sectional study which determined the microbial aetiologies of sepsis from blood cultures of paediatric and adult cancer patients obtained between July 2016 and June 2017. The TDR-X120 blood culture system and TDR 300B auto identification machine were used for incubation of blood culture bottles and identification plus antimicrobial susceptibility testing, respectively.

resultsA total of 142 participants were enrolled; 50 (35.2%) had positive blood cultures, with 56.0% Gram positive, 42.0% Gram-negative bacteria and 2.0% yeast isolated. Common species isolated included coagulase negative Staphylococcus spp. (CoNS) (22.0%), E. coli (16.0%), K. pneumoniae (14.0%), E. faecalis (14.0%) and S. aureus (8.0%). Gram-negative isolates exhibited high resistance to gentamicin (61.9%) and ceftriaxone (71.4%) which are the empiric antimicrobial agents used in our setting. Amikacin and meropenem showed 85.7 and 95.2% activity respectively against all Gram-negative isolates, whilst vancomycin and linezolid were effective against 96.2 and 100.0% of all Gram-positive isolates respectively. We isolated 10 (66.7%) extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) amongst the E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates. Ten (66.7%) of the Staphylococcus spp. were methicillin resistant.

conclusionsCoNS, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, E. faecalis and S. aureus were the major microbial drivers of sepsis amongst cancer patients in Zimbabwe. Most isolates were found to be resistant to commonly used empirical antibiotics, with isolates exhibiting high levels of ESBL and methicillin resistance carriage. A nationwide survey on microbial aetiologies of sepsis and their susceptibility patterns would assist in the guidance of effective sepsis empiric antimicrobial treatment among patients with cancer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleFungiHumansInfantMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAetiologyAntimicrobial resistanceCancerESBLSepsis

Identifiers

PMID32085740
PMCPMC7035672
OpenAlexW3011825127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.