Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085728›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Evaluation of the implementation and associated effects of advanced access in university family medicine groups: a study protocol.

Mylaine Breton, Lara Maillet, Arnaud Duhoux, Sabina Abou Malham, Isabelle Gaboury, Luiza Maria Manceau, Catherine Hudon, Isabel Rodrigues, Jeannie Haggerty, Nassera Touati and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mylaine BretonFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Canada Research Chair - Clinical Governance in Primary Health Care, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada. mylaine.breton@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5713-9618
Lara MailletÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique, Montreal, QC, G1K 9E5, Canada.
Arnaud DuhouxFaculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Sabina Abou MalhamFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Canada Research Chair - Clinical Governance in Primary Health Care, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Isabelle GabouryFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Canada Research Chair - Clinical Governance in Primary Health Care, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Luiza Maria ManceauFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Canada Research Chair - Clinical Governance in Primary Health Care, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Catherine HudonFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Canada Research Chair - Clinical Governance in Primary Health Care, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Isabel RodriguesFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Jeannie HaggertyFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3G 2M1, Canada.
Nassera TouatiÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique, Montreal, QC, G1K 9E5, Canada.
Marie-Claude BeaulieuFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Canada Research Chair - Clinical Governance in Primary Health Care, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Christine LoignonFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Canada Research Chair - Clinical Governance in Primary Health Care, Université de Sherbrooke - Campus Longueuil, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Office 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Marie-Thérèse LussierFaculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada.
Isabelle VedelFaculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3G 2M1, Canada.
Jalila JbilouÉcole de psychologie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB, E1A 3E9, Canada.
France LégaréFaculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 399757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely access in primary health care is one of the key issues facing health systems. Among many interventions developed around the world, advanced access is the most highly recommended intervention designed specifically to improve timely access in primary care settings. Based on greater accessibility linked with patients' relational continuity and informational continuity with a primary care professional or team, this organizational model aims to ensure that patients obtain access to healthcare services at a time and date convenient for them when needed regardless of urgency of demand. Its implementation requires a major organizational change based on reorganizing the practices of all the administrative staff and health professionals. In recent years, advanced access has largely been implemented in primary care organizations. However, despite its wide dissemination, we observe considerable variation in the implementation of the five guiding principles of this model across organizations, as well as among professionals working within the same organization. The main objective of this study is to assess the variation in the implementation of the five guiding principles of advanced access in teaching primary healthcare clinics across Quebec and to better understand the influence of the contextual factors on this variation and on outcomes.

methodsThis study will be based on an explanatory sequential design that includes 1) a quantitative survey conducted in 47 teaching primary healthcare clinics, and 2) a multiple case study using mixed data, contrasted cases (n = 4), representing various implementation profiles and geographical contexts. For each case, semi-structured interviews and focus group will be conducted with professionals and patients. Impact analyses will also be conducted in the four selected clinics using data retrieved from the electronic medical records. DISCUSSION: This study is important in social and political context marked by accessibility issues to primary care services. This research is highly relevant in a context of massive media coverage on timely access to primary healthcare and a large-scale implementation of advanced access across Quebec. This study will likely generate useful lessons and support evidence-based practices to refine and adapt the advanced access model to ensure successful implementation in various clinical contexts facing different challenges.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAcademic Medical CentersAppointments and SchedulesFamily PracticeHumansImplementation ScienceModels, OrganizationalPatient-Centered CareQuebecAdvanced accessCase studyFamily medicineImplementation studyOrganizational changePrimary healthcareRelational continuityTeaching unitsTimely access

Identifiers

PMID32085728
PMCPMC7035780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.