Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085599›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Review of Data Analytic Applications in Road Traffic Safety. Part 1: Descriptive and Predictive Modeling.

Amir Mehdizadeh, Miao Cai, Qiong Hu, Mohammad Ali Alamdar Yazdi, Nasrin Mohabbati-Kalejahi, Alexander Vinel, Steven E Rigdon, Karen C Davis, Fadel M Megahed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amir MehdizadehDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Miao CaiCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0170-6905
Qiong HuDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4438-1012
Mohammad Ali Alamdar YazdiCarey Business School, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA.
Nasrin Mohabbati-KalejahiJack H. Brown College of Business and Public Administration, California State University at San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA, nasrin.mohabbati@csusb.edu.
Alexander VinelDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3095-5986
Steven E RigdonCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA.
Karen C DavisDepartment of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.
Fadel M MegahedFarmer School of Business, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2194-5110

Funding

American Society of Safety Engineers Foundation Advancing Safety Surveillance Using Individualized Sensor Technology (ASSIST)National Science Foundation CMMI-1635927; CMMI-1634992Ohio Supercomputer Center PMIU0138 and PMIU0162Transportation Informatics Tier I University Transportation Center DTRT13-G-UTC48
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This part of the review aims to reduce the start-up burden of data collection and descriptive analytics for statistical modeling and route optimization of risk associated with motor vehicles. From a data-driven bibliometric analysis, we show that the literature is divided into two disparate research streams: (a) predictive or explanatory models that attempt to understand and quantify crash risk based on different driving conditions, and (b) optimization techniques that focus on minimizing crash risk through route/path-selection and rest-break scheduling. Translation of research outcomes between these two streams is limited. To overcome this issue, we present publicly available high-quality data sources (different study designs, outcome variables, and predictor variables) and descriptive analytic techniques (data summarization, visualization, and dimension reduction) that can be used to achieve safer-routing and provide code to facilitate data collection/exploration by practitioners/researchers. Then, we review the statistical and machine learning models used for crash risk modeling. We show that (near) real-time crash risk is rarely considered, which might explain why the optimization models (reviewed in Part 2) have not capitalized on the research outcomes from the first stream.

Indexed as

crash risk modelingdata visualizationdescriptive analyticshighway safetypredictive analytics

Identifiers

PMID32085599
PMCPMC7070501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.