Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085542›Full record

SynthesisToxins2020

Comparing the Efficacy of OnabotulinumtoxinA, Sacral Neuromodulation, and Peripheral Tibial Nerve Stimulation as Third Line Treatment for the Management of Overactive Bladder Symptoms in Adults: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Chi-Wen Lo, Mei-Yi Wu, Stephen Shei-Dei Yang, Fu-Shan Jaw, Shang-Jen Chang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Toxins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07019597 (Non-invasive NESA Neuromodulation Versus Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07019597 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Non-invasive NESA Neuromodulation Versus Transcutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder

TypeinterventionalSponsorDaniel David Álamo ArceRan2025 to 2025Enrolled25ConditionsBladder DysfunctionArmsNon-invasive neuromodulation NESA(NNG), Non-invasive Neuromodulation Posterior Tibial (NTPG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Urologist-perceived barriers and perspectives on the underuse of sacral neuromodulation for overactive bladder in Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chi-Wen LoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Mei-Yi WuDepartment of Nephrology, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei 23561, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5777-2752
Stephen Shei-Dei YangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei 23142, Taiwan.
Fu-Shan JawInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.
Shang-Jen ChangDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei 23142, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University · TWTzu Chi University · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TW

Funding

Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital TCRD-TPE-107-52
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Urological Association guidelines for the management of non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB) recommend the use of OnabotulinumtoxinA, sacral neuromodulation (SNM), and peripheral tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) as third line treatment options with no treatment hierarchy. The current study used network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of these three modalities for managing adult OAB syndrome. We performed systematic literature searches of several databases from January 1995 to September 2019 with language restricted to English. All randomized control trials that compared any dose of OnabotulinumtoxinA, SNM, and PTNS with each other or a placebo for the management of adult OAB were included in the study. Overall, 17 randomized control trials, with a follow up of 3-6 months in the predominance of trials (range 1.5-24 months), were included for analysis. For each trial outcome, the results were reported as an average number of episodes of the outcome at baseline. Compared with the placebo, all three treatments were more efficacious for the selected outcome parameters. OnabotulinumtoxinA resulted in a higher number of complications, including urinary tract infection and urine retention. Compared with OnabotulinumtoxinA and PTNS, SNM resulted in the greatest reduction in urinary incontinence episodes and voiding frequency. However, comparison of their long-term efficacy was lacking. Further studies on the long-term effectiveness of the three treatment options, with standardized questionnaires and parameters are warranted.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ALumbosacral PlexusNeuromuscular AgentsTibial NerveTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationUrinary Bladder, OveractiveHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsonabotulinum toxin Anetwork meta-analysisOnabotulinumtoxinAoveractive bladderperipheral tibial nerve stimulationsacral neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID32085542
PMCPMC7077313
OpenAlexW3007666198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.