Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085529›Full record

Trial reportToxins2020

Efficacy and Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA 400 Units in Patients with Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: Final Report of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial with an Open-Label Extension Phase.

Masahiro Abo, Takashi Shigematsu, Hiroyoshi Hara, Yasuko Matsuda, Akinori Nimura, Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Kaoru Takahashi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Toxins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03261167 (A Phase III Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03261167 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Study (a Placebo Controlled, Randomized, Double-blind Comparative Study and an Open-label, Uncontrolled Study) to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK1358820 in Patients With Post-stroke Upper Limb Spasticity

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2017 to 2019Enrolled124ConditionsSpasticity, Post-StrokeArmsBotulinum toxin A (GSK1358820), Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Headache After Stroke: An Update for the Clinician.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiro AboDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6701-4974
Takashi ShigematsuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seirei Hamamatsu City Rehabilitation Hospital, Shizuoka 433-8511, Japan.
Hiroyoshi HaraDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kikyogahara Hospital, Nagano 399-6461, Japan.
Yasuko MatsudaGlaxoSmithKline K.K., Tokyo 107-0052, Japan.
Akinori NimuraGlaxoSmithKline K.K., Tokyo 107-0052, Japan.
Yoshiyuki YamashitaGlaxoSmithKline K.K., Tokyo 107-0052, Japan.
Kaoru TakahashiGlaxoSmithKline K.K., Tokyo 107-0052, Japan.
GlaxoSmithKline (Japan) · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPSeirei Hamamatsu General Hospital · JP

Funding

GlaxoSmithKline K.K. NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many countries, 400 units (U) is the maximum dose of onabotulinumtoxinA available to treat upper limb spasticity, but few studies have demonstrated the optimal use of this dose. In the double-blind phase of this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of 400 vs. 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. Both groups received 240 U onabotulinumtoxinA injected in the forearm. An additional 160 U onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) or placebo (240 U group) was injected in the elbow flexors. Both groups showed similar muscle tone reduction in the wrist, fingers, and thumb; muscle tone reduction in the elbow flexors was greater in the group treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (400 U group) compared to placebo (240 U group). Functional disabilities improved in both groups. No substantial difference was found in safety profiles. In the subsequent open-label phase, all participants received repeat injections of 400 U onabotulinumtoxinA (target muscles and doses per muscle determined by the physician). Similar efficacy and safety outcomes, as with the 400 U group in the double-blind phase, were confirmed. This final report demonstrates that injection of onabotulinumtoxinA 400 U relieves muscle tone in a wide range of areas and improves functional disabilities; generally, it was well-tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified. The dosing data in the open-label phase will inform optimal use of onabotulinumtoxinA in clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03261167).

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ADouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansInjections, IntramuscularMaleMiddle AgedMuscle SpasticityNeuromuscular AgentsStrokeStroke RehabilitationTreatment OutcomeUpper ExtremityBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeuromuscular Agentsonabotulinum toxin Abotulinum toxinrandomized controlled trialstrokeupper limb spasticity

Identifiers

PMID32085529
PMCPMC7077183
OpenAlexW3007013292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.