Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085503›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Nutrition Policy and Individual Struggle to Eat Healthily: The Question of Public Support.

Kristin Jürkenbeck, Anke Zühlsdorf, Achim Spiller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristin JürkenbeckDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing of Food and Agricultural Products, University of Goettingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Anke ZühlsdorfDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing of Food and Agricultural Products, University of Goettingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Achim SpillerDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Marketing of Food and Agricultural Products, University of Goettingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur .Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband (vzbv) .
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evidence for the effectiveness of nutrition policy interventions is growing. For the implementation of such interventions, social acceptability is crucial. Therefore, this study provides insight into public support for nutrition policy measures such as labelling and taxation. Further it analyses the level of acceptance in a quantitative segmentation approach. A new element to our approach is the comparison of different policy instruments, focusing on the interaction between policy acceptance and the perceived individual struggle to eat healthily. The survey was conducted in November 2017 and a total of 1035 German consumers are included in the data. The results indicate that the majority of German citizens accept nutrition policy interventions. Based on a cluster analysis, five different target groups according to the general acceptance of policy interventions and their own struggle to eat healthily are derived. The five-cluster solution reveals that both consumers who tend to eat a healthy diet as well as those who have problems with their diet support nutritional interventions. This shows that the perceived own struggle to eat healthily does not predict whether consumers accept nutrition policy interventions.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorDiet, HealthyHealth BehaviorNutrition PolicyPatient Acceptance of Health CarePublic HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesCluster AnalysisGermanyGovernmentHealth PromotionHumansacceptabilitygovernmenthealth statusintervention laddernutrition policy instruments

Identifiers

PMID32085503
PMCPMC7071418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.