Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085464›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Recapitulating the Vasculature Using Organ-On-Chip Technology.

Andreas M A O Pollet, Jaap M J den Toonder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Model Systems to Study the Mechanism of Vascular Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. AnFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  19. Exploring Endothelial Expansion on a Chip.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreas M A O PolletMicrosystems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9571-2902
Jaap M J den ToonderMicrosystems, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5923-4456

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 15282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of Vasculature-on-Chip has progressed rapidly over the last decade and recently, a wealth of fabrication possibilities has emerged that can be used for engineering vessels on a chip. All these fabrication methods have their own advantages and disadvantages but, more importantly, the capability of recapitulating the in vivo vasculature differs greatly between them. The first part of this review discusses the biological background of the in vivo vasculature and all the associated processes. We then evaluate the biological relevance of different fabrication methods proposed for Vasculature-on-Chip, we indicate their possibilities and limitations, and we assess which fabrication methods are capable of recapitulating the intrinsic complexity of the vasculature. This review illustrates the complexity involved in developing in vitro vasculature and provides an overview of fabrication methods for Vasculature-on-Chip in relation to the biological relevance of such methods.

Indexed as

angiogenesismicrofabricationmicrofluidicsorgan-on-chipvasculaturevasculogenesis

Identifiers

PMID32085464
PMCPMC7175276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.