Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085455›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2020

Immersion Bioprinting of Tumor Organoids in Multi-Well Plates for Increasing Chemotherapy Screening Throughput.

Erin Maloney, Casey Clark, Hemamylammal Sivakumar, KyungMin Yoo, Julio Aleman, Shiny A P Rajan, Steven Forsythe, Andrea Mazzocchi, Adrian W Laxton, Stephen B Tatter and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. New developments and applications of human organoids.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Thiolated Polymers in 3D Bioprinting: Control of Gelation.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. A review of 3D bioprinting for organoids.Medical review (2021) · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Recent advances in 3D printing applications for CNS tumours.European journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin MaloneyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Casey ClarkWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, USA.
Hemamylammal SivakumarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
KyungMin YooWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, USA.
Julio AlemanWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, USA.
Shiny A P RajanWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, USA.
Steven ForsytheWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, USA.
Andrea MazzocchiWake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, USA.
Adrian W LaxtonComprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Stephen B TatterComprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Roy E StrowdComprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Konstantinos I VotanopoulosComprehensive Cancer Center at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Aleksander SkardalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Forest Institute · USAtrium Health Wake Forest Baptist · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Tissue CoreP30CA012197 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ruben A. Mesa · 1985 to 2026
$55.4M
Studies in Translational Regenerative MedicineT32EB014836 · NIBIB · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ANTHONY ATALA, Victoria Weis · 2013 to 2026
$1.7M
Predicting Tumor Heterogeneity Evolution After Therapy In Patient-Derived Ex Vivo Glioblastoma OrganoidsR21CA229027 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SKARDAL, ALEKSANDER, STROWD, ROY ERVIN · 2018 to 2019
$597k
NCI NIH HHS P30CA012197NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB014836NIH HHS R21CA229027U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH-15-9-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current drug development pipeline takes approximately fifteen years and $2.6 billion to get a new drug to market. Typically, drugs are tested on two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures and animal models to estimate their efficacy before reaching human trials. However, these models are often not representative of the human body. The 2D culture changes the morphology and physiology of cells, and animal models often have a vastly different anatomy and physiology than humans. The use of bioengineered human cell-based organoids may increase the probability of success during human trials by providing human-specific preclinical data. They could also be deployed for personalized medicine diagnostics to optimize therapies in diseases such as cancer. However, one limitation in employing organoids in drug screening has been the difficulty in creating large numbers of homogeneous organoids in form factors compatible with high-throughput screening (e.g., 96- and 384-well plates). Bioprinting can be used to scale up deposition of such organoids and tissue constructs. Unfortunately, it has been challenging to 3D print hydrogel bioinks into small-sized wells due to well-bioink interactions that can result in bioinks spreading out and wetting the well surface instead of maintaining a spherical form. Here, we demonstrate an immersion printing technique to bioprint tissue organoids in 96-well plates to increase the throughput of 3D drug screening. A hydrogel bioink comprised of hyaluronic acid and collagen is bioprinted into a viscous gelatin bath, which blocks the bioink from interacting with the well walls and provides support to maintain a spherical form. This method was validated using several cancerous cell lines, and then applied to patient-derived glioblastoma (GBM) and sarcoma biospecimens for drug screening.

Indexed as

bioinkbioprintingcancerdrug screeningextracellular matrixorganoidpersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID32085455
PMCPMC7074680
OpenAlexW3007373781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.