Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085436›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

On-Ground Vineyard Reconstruction Using a LiDAR-Based Automated System.

Hugo Moreno, Constantino Valero, José María Bengochea-Guevara, Ángela Ribeiro, Miguel Garrido-Izard, Dionisio Andújar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hugo MorenoCentre for Automation and Robotics, CAR-CSIC, Arganda del Rey, 28500 Madrid, Spain.
Constantino ValeroLaboratorio de Propiedades Físicas (LPF_TRAGRALIA), ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4473-3209
José María Bengochea-GuevaraCentre for Automation and Robotics, CAR-CSIC, Arganda del Rey, 28500 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4081-7325
Ángela RibeiroCentre for Automation and Robotics, CAR-CSIC, Arganda del Rey, 28500 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5807-8132
Miguel Garrido-IzardLaboratorio de Propiedades Físicas (LPF_TRAGRALIA), ETSIAAB, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7880-6499
Dionisio AndújarCentre for Automation and Robotics, CAR-CSIC, Arganda del Rey, 28500 Madrid, Spain.
Centre for Automation and Robotics · ESUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación AGL2017-83325-C4-3-RMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España RYC-2016-20355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop 3D modeling allows site-specific management at different crop stages. In recent years, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors have been widely used for gathering information about plant architecture to extract biophysical parameters for decision-making programs. The study reconstructed vineyard crops using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology. Its accuracy and performance were assessed for vineyard crop characterization using distance measurements, aiming to obtain a 3D reconstruction. A LiDAR sensor was installed on-board a mobile platform equipped with an RTK-GNSS receiver for crop 2D scanning. The LiDAR system consisted of a 2D time-of-flight sensor, a gimbal connecting the device to the structure, and an RTK-GPS to record the sensor data position. The LiDAR sensor was facing downwards installed on-board an electric platform. It scans in planes perpendicular to the travel direction. Measurements of distance between the LiDAR and the vineyards had a high spatial resolution, providing high-density 3D point clouds. The 3D point cloud was obtained containing all the points where the laser beam impacted. The fusion of LiDAR impacts and the positions of each associated to the RTK-GPS allowed the creation of the 3D structure. Although point clouds were already filtered, discarding points out of the study area, the branch volume cannot be directly calculated, since it turns into a 3D solid cluster that encloses a volume. To obtain the 3D object surface, and therefore to be able to calculate the volume enclosed by this surface, a suitable alpha shape was generated as an outline that envelops the outer points of the point cloud. The 3D scenes were obtained during the winter season when only branches were present and defoliated. The models were used to extract information related to height and branch volume. These models might be used for automatic pruning or relating this parameter to evaluate the future yield at each location. The 3D map was correlated with ground truth, which was manually determined, pruning the remaining weight. The number of scans by LiDAR influenced the relationship with the actual biomass measurements and had a significant effect on the treatments. A positive linear fit was obtained for the comparison between actual dry biomass and LiDAR volume. The influence of individual treatments was of low significance. The results showed strong correlations with actual values of biomass and volume with R2 = 0.75, and when comparing LiDAR scans with weight, the R2 rose up to 0.85. The obtained values show that this LiDAR technique is also valid for branch reconstruction with great advantages over other types of non-contact ranging sensors, regarding a high sampling resolution and high sampling rates. Even narrow branches were properly detected, which demonstrates the accuracy of the system working on difficult scenarios such as defoliated crops.

Indexed as

laser measurementsplant volume estimationvineshoot volumevineyard proximal sensing

Identifiers

PMID32085436
PMCPMC7070798
OpenAlexW3009022214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.