Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32085422›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Utilization of Mobile Mental Health Services among Syrian Refugees and Other Vulnerable Arab Populations-A Systematic Review.

Adeel Ashfaq, Shawn Esmaili, Mona Najjar, Farva Batool, Tariq Mukatash, Hadeer Akram Al-Ani, Patrick Marius Koga

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Proposal of a New Rating Concept for Digital Health Applications in Orthopedics and Traumatology.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Digital interventions for refugees. Challenges, opportunities, and perspectives ofEthik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adeel AshfaqDepartment of Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5906-8128
Shawn EsmailiULYSSES Project University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Mona NajjarULYSSES Project University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Farva BatoolULYSSES Project University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Tariq MukatashULYSSES Project University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Hadeer Akram Al-AniULYSSES Project University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Patrick Marius KogaULYSSES Project University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1777-6027
University of California, Davis · USKaiser Permanente · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global refugee crisis is at its most critical state in history; Syria alone has produced 12 million internally displaced persons, with another 5 million refugees seeking protection across the globe. Faced with the heavy burden of mental distress carried by a massive refugee influx, many host nations lack the service capacity to respond adequately. While mobile mental health (mMHealth) applications and platforms have the potential to augment screenings and interventions for vulnerable populations, an insufficient gender and cultural adaptation of technology may drastically hamper its uptake in Arab refugees. Reporting only papers originating from Middle Eastern and/or Arab nations or refugee host nations, this systematic review evaluates the available literature published between 2000 and 2019 on the usage acceptability of mMHealth in Syrian refugees and other vulnerable Arab populations. We conducted a systematic review in PubMed, PsychInfo, Association of Computing Machinery (ACM) and the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies that addressed mMHealth implementation in these populations; of a total of 607 articles identified, only 10 (1.6%) available, unique articles met our search criteria. These studies discussed the feasibility and efficacy of mMHealth applications and the barriers to their uptake. The few existing studies show positive impacts of mMHealth on the access to services and on treatment outcomes but also reveal a paucity of literature on mMHealth for vulnerable Arab populations. These findings indicate a critical need for research on the barriers to mMHealth uptake, to bolster service capacity in the Arab Region and in the refugee diaspora of other, non-Arab host countries.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesMobile ApplicationsRefugeesVulnerable PopulationsAdultArabsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansSyriaTelemedicineArab Regionhealth capacitymental healthmMHealthmobile healthrefugeesSyrian refugeetelehealth

Identifiers

PMID32085422
PMCPMC7068284
OpenAlexW3008772916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.