Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32084220›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Feasibility of selective cardiac ventricular electroporation.

Alan Sugrue, Vaibhav R Vaidya, Christopher Livia, Deepak Padmanabhan, Anas Abudan, Ameesh Isath, Tyra Witt, Christopher V DeSimone, Paul Stalboerger, Suraj Kapa and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06144632 (Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF Catheter With the TRUPULSE Generator for Treatment of Drug Refractory Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06144632 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH SF Catheter With the TRUPULSE Generator for Treatment of Drug Refractory Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBiosense Webster, Inc.Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled237ConditionsDrug Refractory Paroxysmal Atrial FibrillationArmsTHERMOCOOL STSF Bi- Directional Navigation Catheter, TRUPULSE Generator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contemporary Trends in Pulsed Field Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. In vivo pulsed-field ablation in healthy vs. chronically infarcted ventricular myocardium: biophysical and histologic characterization.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of the Literature.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Future Perspectives and New "Frontiers" in Cardiac Rhythmology.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Non-viral Gene Delivery Methods for Bone and Joints.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan SugrueDivision of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9921-6968
Vaibhav R VaidyaDivision of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Christopher LiviaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine and Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1772-450X
Deepak PadmanabhanDivision of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Anas AbudanDivision of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Ameesh IsathDivision of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Tyra WittDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine and Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Christopher V DeSimoneDivision of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Paul StalboergerDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine and Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Center for Regenerative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Suraj KapaDivision of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Samuel J AsirvathamDivision of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Christopher J McLeodDivision of Heart Rhythm Services, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Predoctoral Training Program in Molecular PharmacologyT32GM072474 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KARNITZ, LARRY M · 2005 to 2020
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM072474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe application of brief high voltage electrical pulses to tissue can lead to an irreversible or reversible electroporation effect in a cell-specific manner. In the management of ventricular arrhythmias, the ability to target different tissue types, specifically cardiac conduction tissue (His-Purkinje System) vs. cardiac myocardium would be advantageous. We hypothesize that pulsed electric fields (PEFs) can be applied safely to the beating heart through a catheter-based approach, and we tested whether the superficial Purkinje cells can be targeted with PEFs without injury to underlying myocardial tissue.

methodsIn an acute (n = 5) and chronic canine model (n = 6), detailed electroanatomical mapping of the left ventricle identified electrical signals from myocardial and overlying Purkinje tissue. Electroporation was effected via percutaneous catheter-based Intracardiac bipolar current delivery in the anesthetized animal. Repeat Intracardiac electrical mapping of the heart was performed at acute and chronic time points; followed by histological analysis to assess effects.

resultsPEF demonstrated an acute dose-dependent functional effect on Purkinje, with titration of pulse duration and/or voltage associated with successful acute Purkinje damage. Electrical conduction in the insulated bundle of His (n = 2) and anterior fascicle bundle (n = 2), was not affected. At 30 days repeat cardiac mapping demonstrated resilient, normal electrical conduction throughout the targeted area with no significant change in myocardial amplitude (pre 5.9 ± 1.8 mV, 30 days 5.4 ± 1.2 mV, p = 0.92). Histopathological analysis confirmed acute Purkinje fiber targeting, with chronic studies showing normal Purkinje fibers, with minimal subendocardial myocardial fibrosis.

conclusionPEF provides a novel, safe method for non-thermal acute modulation of the Purkinje fibers without significant injury to the underlying myocardium. Future optimization of this energy delivery is required to optimize conditions so that selective electroporation can be utilized in humans the treatment of cardiac disease.

Indexed as

ElectroporationAnimalsDogsFeasibility StudiesHeart VentriclesMalePurkinje CellsSafetyTissue SurvivalVentricular Function

Identifiers

PMID32084220
PMCPMC7034868
OpenAlexW3006709435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.