Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32084208›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Comparative effects of two heat acclimation protocols consisting of high-intensity interval training in the heat on aerobic performance and thermoregulatory responses in exercising rats.

Myla Aguiar Bittencourt, Samuel Penna Wanner, Ana Cançado Kunstetter, Nicolas Henrique Santos Barbosa, Paula Carolina Leite Walker, Pedro Victor Ribeiro Andrade, Tiago Turnes, Luiz Guilherme Antonacci Guglielmo

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Myla Aguiar BittencourtPhysical Effort Laboratory, Graduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Samuel Penna WannerExercise Physiology Laboratory, Graduate Program in Sport Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4659-1032
Ana Cançado KunstetterExercise Physiology Laboratory, Graduate Program in Sport Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nicolas Henrique Santos BarbosaExercise Physiology Laboratory, Graduate Program in Sport Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Paula Carolina Leite WalkerExercise Physiology Laboratory, Graduate Program in Sport Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Pedro Victor Ribeiro AndradeExercise Physiology Laboratory, Graduate Program in Sport Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Tiago TurnesPhysical Effort Laboratory, Graduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Luiz Guilherme Antonacci GuglielmoPhysical Effort Laboratory, Graduate Program in Physical Education, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acclimation resulting from low- to moderate-intensity physical exertion in the heat induces several thermoregulatory adaptations, including slower exercise-induced increases in core body temperature. However, few studies have investigated the thermoregulatory adaptations induced by high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols. Thus, the present study aimed to compare the adaptations in rats' thermoregulatory parameters and aerobic performance observed after two different heat acclimation regimens consisting of HIIT protocols performed in a hot environment. Twenty-three adult male Wistar rats were initially subjected to an incremental-speed exercise at 32°C until they were fatigued and then randomly assigned to one of the following three heat acclimation strategies: passive heat exposure without any exercise (untrained controls-UN; n = 7), HIIT performed at the maximal aerobic speed (HIIT100%; n = 8) and HIIT performed at a high but submaximal speed (HIIT85%; n = 8). Following the two weeks of interventions, the rats were again subjected to a fatiguing incremental exercise at 32°C, while their colonic temperature (TCOL) was recorded. The workload performed by the rats and their thermoregulatory efficiency were calculated. After the intervention period, rats subjected to both HIIT protocols attained greater workloads (HIIT100%: 313.7 ± 21.9 J vs. HIIT85%: 318.1 ± 32.6 J vs. UN: 250.8 ± 32.4 J; p < 0.01) and presented a lower ratio between the change in TCOL and the distance travelled (HIIT100%: 4.95 ± 0.42°C/km vs. HIIT85%: 4.33 ± 0.59°C/km vs. UN: 6.14 ± 1.03°C/km; p < 0.001) when compared to UN rats. The latter finding indicates better thermoregulatory efficiency in trained animals. No differences were observed between rats subjected to the two HIIT regimens. In conclusion, the two HIIT protocols induce greater thermoregulatory adaptations and performance improvements than passive heat exposure. These adaptations do not differ between the two training protocols investigated in the present study.

Indexed as

Hot TemperatureAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBody Temperature RegulationHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingMalePhysical Conditioning, AnimalPhysical ExertionRatsRats, WistarTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID32084208
PMCPMC7034902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.