Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32084160›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Self-reported negative outcomes of psilocybin users: A quantitative textual analysis.

Bheatrix Bienemann, Nina Stamato Ruschel, Maria Luiza Campos, Marco Aurélio Negreiros, Daniel C Mograbi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of psilocybin on uncertain punishment learning.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Synthetic surprise as the foundation of the psychedelic experience.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Tracking demands for seeking psychological help before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a quanti-qualitative study.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2023
    Article
  18. Psilocybin's effects on cognition and creativity: A scoping review.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bheatrix BienemannDepartment of Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nina Stamato RuschelDepartment of Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Luiza CamposDepartment of Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marco Aurélio NegreirosDepartment of Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel C MograbiDepartment of Psychology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4271-2984
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo · BRKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psilocybin, a substance mainly found in mushrooms of the genus psilocybe, has been historically used for ritualistic, recreational and, more recently, medicinal purposes. The scientific literature suggests low toxicity, low risk of addiction, overdose, or other causes of injury commonly caused by substances of abuse, with growing interest in the use of this substance for conditions such as treatment-resistant depression. However, the presence of negative outcomes linked to psilocybin use is not clear yet. The objective of this study is to investigate the negative effects of psilocybin consumption, according to the users' own perception through self-reports extracted from an online platform. 346 reports were analyzed with the assistance of the IRAMUTEQ textual analysis software, adopting the procedures of Descending Hierarchical Classification, Correspondence Factor Analysis and Specificities Analysis. The text segments were grouped in 4 main clusters, describing thinking distortions, emergencies, perceptual alterations and the administration of the substance. Bad trips were more frequent in female users, being associated with thinking distortions. The use of multiple doses of psilocybin in the same session or its combination with other substances was linked to the occurrence of long-term negative outcomes, while the use of mushrooms in single high doses was linked to medical emergencies. These results can be useful for a better understanding of the effects of psilocybin use, guiding harm-reduction initiatives.

Indexed as

AgaricalesFemaleHallucinogensHumansMalePsilocybinSelf ReportSoftwareHallucinogensPsilocybin

Identifiers

PMID32084160
PMCPMC7034876
OpenAlexW3007379062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.