Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32084135›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Phenotype-based probabilistic analysis of heterogeneous responses to cancer drugs and their combination efficacy.

Natacha Comandante-Lou, Mehwish Khaliq, Divya Venkat, Mohan Manikkam, Mohammad Fallahi-Sichani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Charting the Fragmented Landscape of Drug Synergy.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natacha Comandante-LouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7981-7333
Mehwish KhaliqDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8757-8013
Divya VenkatDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Mohan ManikkamDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7033-8977
Mohammad Fallahi-SichaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0917-3525

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Decoding the Logic of Cellular Signaling Through the Integration of Dynamic, Single-Cell and Multiplexed MethodsR35GM133404 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI Mohammad Fallahi-Sichani · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
Adaptive regulation of cancer cell fate following oncogene inhibitionR00CA194163 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI FALLAHI-SICHANI, MOHAMMAD · 2017 to 2019
$747k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R00 CA194163NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell-to-cell variability generates subpopulations of drug-tolerant cells that diminish the efficacy of cancer drugs. Efficacious combination therapies are thus needed to block drug-tolerant cells via minimizing the impact of heterogeneity. Probabilistic models such as Bliss independence have been developed to evaluate drug interactions and their combination efficacy based on probabilities of specific actions mediated by drugs individually and in combination. In practice, however, these models are often applied to conventional dose-response curves in which a normalized parameter with a value between zero and one, generally referred to as fraction of cells affected (fa), is used to evaluate the efficacy of drugs and their combined interactions. We use basic probability theory, computer simulations, time-lapse live cell microscopy, and single-cell analysis to show that fa metrics may bias our assessment of drug efficacy and combination effectiveness. This bias may be corrected when dynamic probabilities of drug-induced phenotypic events, i.e. induction of cell death and inhibition of division, at a single-cell level are used as metrics to assess drug efficacy. Probabilistic phenotype metrics offer the following three benefits. First, in contrast to the commonly used fa metrics, they directly represent probabilities of drug action in a cell population. Therefore, they deconvolve differential degrees of drug effect on tumor cell killing versus inhibition of cell division, which may not be correlated for many drugs. Second, they increase the sensitivity of short-term drug response assays to cell-to-cell heterogeneities and the presence of drug-tolerant subpopulations. Third, their probabilistic nature allows them to be used directly in unbiased evaluation of synergistic efficacy in drug combinations using probabilistic models such as Bliss independence. Altogether, we envision that probabilistic analysis of single-cell phenotypes complements currently available assays via improving our understanding of heterogeneity in drug response, thereby facilitating the discovery of more efficacious combination therapies to block drug-tolerant cells.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationProbabilityAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyComputer SimulationHumansMelanomaModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsPhenotypePoisson DistributionAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID32084135
PMCPMC7055924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.