SynthesisJAMA network open2020
Comparison of Cardiovascular Events Among Users of Different Classes of Antihypertension Medications: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- European guidelines for hypertension in 2024: a comparison of key recommendations for clinical practice.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Guideline
- Effectiveness and safety of chronic diuretic use in older adults: an umbrella review of recently published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized-controlled trials.European geriatric medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Identifying optimal primary prevention interventions for major cardiovascular disease events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and hierarchical network meta-analysis of RCTs.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
- Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and safety of fimasartan in patients with hypertension: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Physical Performance in Older People - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of Sacubitril/Allisartan versus Olmesartan on serum uric acid in Chinese patients with hypertension and hyperuricaemia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Trial
- Bioequivalence and Food Effect Assessment of Two Fixed-Dose Combination Formulations of Telmisartan-Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets in Chinese Healthy Subjects.Clinical and translational science · 2025Trial
- Effect of chronic angiotensin system inhibitor treatment on cardiovascular adaptations to exercise training in adults with metabolic syndrome.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Article
- Angiotensin receptor blockers and dementia risk in older adults: A target trial emulation.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Challenges and Perspectives in Optimising the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension: Role of the Ramipril-Amlodipine-Hydrochlorothiazide Single-Pill Combination.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Risk factor heterogeneity across cardiovascular disease outcomes in treatment-eligible hypertensive patients.Journal of hypertension · 2026Article
- A longitudinal dataset of hypertensive osteoporotic fracture patients: treatments and long-term outcomes.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Association Between Genetically Proxied SLC12A2 Inhibition and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- European Hypertension Guidelines: Similarities and What the Practicing Physician Should Keep in Mind.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- 2021 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Periodic Health Examination.Acta medica Philippina · 2026Article
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- First-Line β-Blocker Use for Hypertension in the Veterans Health Administration.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- The role of single-pill ACE inhibitor/ccb combination for hypertension: an Algerian view via the nominal group technique.Future cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Antihypertension medications have been associated with prevention of cardiovascular events, although less is known about the comparative effectiveness of different medication classes. Objective: To compare contemporary aggregated first-in-trial cardiovascular events among patients with hypertension and no substantial comorbidities. Data Sources: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles published between January 1, 1990, and October 24, 2017. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials that tested commonly used antihypertension medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, β-blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, and diuretics) and that reported selected cardiovascular outcomes for at least 6 months of follow-up. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The analysis was conducted from October 2017 to December 2019. Two reviewers extracted the number of cardiovascular events at the end of treatment for all study groups. For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was used to compare risk reductions between medication classes (random-effects models weighted by the inverse variance). The dose-response association between a 10-mm Hg reduction of systolic blood pressure and a 5-mm Hg reduction of diastolic blood pressure and the risk of first-in-trial cardiovascular events was estimated. Main Outcomes and Measures: First-in-trial cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization. Results: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, data were pooled from 46 eligible clinical trials (248 887 total participants with a mean [SD] age of 65.6 [5.8] years; 52.8% men). In the network meta-analysis, compared with placebo, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and thiazide diuretics were reported to be similarly effective in reducing overall cardiovascular events (25%), cardiovascular death (20%), and stroke (35%); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were reported to be the most effective in reducing the risk of myocardial infarction (28%); and diuretics were reported to be the most effective in reducing revascularization (33%). In the metaregression analyses, each 10-mm Hg reduction in systolic blood pressure and 5-mm Hg reduction in diastolic blood pressure was significantly associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death, stroke, and overall cardiovascular events. Conclusions and Relevance: In this network meta-analysis of clinical trials of patients with hypertension and no substantial comorbidities, different classes of antihypertension medications were associated with similar benefits in reducing cardiovascular events. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of combinations of antihypertension medications in reducing cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.