Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32083289›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2020

Examining Gene-Environment Interactions Using Aggregate Scores in a First-Episode Psychosis Cohort.

Sergi Mas, Daniel Boloc, Natalia Rodríguez, Gisela Mezquida, Silvia Amoretti, Manuel J Cuesta, Javier González-Peñas, Alicia García-Alcón, Antonio Lobo, Ana González-Pinto and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Global research trends on the human exposome: a bibliometric analysis (2005-2024).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stress, Environment and Early Psychosis.Current neuropharmacology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Identification ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Sergi MasDepartment of Clinical Foundations, Pharmacology Unit, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel BolocDepartment of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Natalia RodríguezDepartment of Clinical Foundations, Pharmacology Unit, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Gisela MezquidaDepartment of Clinical Foundations, Pharmacology Unit, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia AmorettiCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Spain.
Manuel J CuestaDepartment of Psychiatry, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Javier González-PeñasDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM). Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Alicia García-AlcónDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM). Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Antonio LoboDepartment of Medicine and Psychiatry, Zaragoza University, Spain. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Aragón (IIS Aragón), Zaragoza. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Ana González-PintoCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Spain.
Iluminada CorripioBiomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB-SANT PAU), Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
Eduard VietaInstitut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPs), Barcelona, Spain.
Josefina Castro-FornielesDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology, Clínic Institute of Neurosciences, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, 2017SGR881, University of Barcelona, CIBERSAM, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna ManéHospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
Jeronimo Saiz-RuizUniversidad de Alcalá, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Madrid, Spain.
Patricia GassóDepartment of Clinical Foundations, Pharmacology Unit, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel BioqueBarcelona Clínic Schizophrenia Unit, Neuroscience Institute Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel BernardoInstitut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPs), Barcelona, Spain.
PEPs Group
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESPepsiCo (United Kingdom) · GBUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene-environment (GxE) interactions have been related to psychosis spectrum disorders, involving multiple common genetic variants in multiple genes with very small effect sizes, and several environmental factors that constitute a dense network of exposures named the exposome. Here, we aimed to analyze GxE in a cohort of 310 first-episode psychotic (FEP) and 236 healthy controls, by using aggregate scores estimated in large populations such as the polygenic risk score for schizophrenia and (PRS-SCZ) and the Maudsley environmental risk score (ERS). In contrast to previous findings, in our study, the PRS-SCZ did not discriminate cases from controls, but the ERS score explained a similar percentage of the variance as in other studies using similar approaches. Our study supports a positive additive interaction, indicating synergy between genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia (PRS-SCZ dichotomized according to the highest quartile distribution of the control population) and the exposome (ERS > 75% of the controls). This additive interaction showed genetic and environmental dose dependence. Our study shows that the use of aggregate scores derived from large and powered studies instead of statistics derived from specific sample characteristics is a powerful tool for the study of the effects of GxE on the risk of psychotic spectrum disorders. In conclusion, by using a genetic risk score and an ERS we have provided further evidence for the role of GxE in psychosis.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychotic DisordersRiskYoung Adultenvironmental risk scoreexposomegeneticspolygenic risk scorepsychosis

Identifiers

PMID32083289
PMCPMC7342095
OpenAlexW3007735197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.