The New Coronavirus, the Current King of China.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Remote Analysis of Respiratory Sounds in Patients With COVID-19: Development of Fast Fourier Transform-Based Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Methods.JMIR formative research · 2022
   Article
2. A severe case of human coronavirus 229E pneumonia in an elderly man with diabetes mellitus: a case report.BMC infectious diseases · 2021
   Article
3. COVID-19: FAQs in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery-A Sequel.World journal for pediatric & congenital heart surgery · 2020
   Review
4. Advances in the relationship between coronavirus infection and cardiovascular diseases.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2020
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as