ArticleThe Analyst2020
Automated platform for cell selection and separation based on four-dimensional motility and matrix degradation.
Article in The Analyst, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cellular microarrays for assessing single-cell phenotypic changes in vascular cell populations.Biomedical microdevices · 2023Article
- New Frontiers in Colorectal Cancer Treatment Combining Nanotechnology with Photo- and Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2023Review
- Suspended Collagen Hydrogels to Replicate Human Colonic Epithelial Cell Interactions with Immune Cells.Advanced biology · 2022Article
- A technology of a different sort: microraft arrays.Lab on a chip · 2021Review
- Image-Based Live Cell Sorting.Trends in biotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motility and invasion are key steps in the metastatic cascade, enabling cells to move through normal tissue borders into the surrounding stroma. Most available in vitro assays track cell motility or cell invasion but lack the ability to measure both simultaneously and then separate single cells with unique behaviors. In this work, we developed a cell-separation platform capable of tracking cell movement (chemokinesis) and invasion through an extracellular matrix in space and time. The platform utilized a collagen scaffold with embedded tumor cells overlaid onto a microraft array. Confocal microscopy enabled high resolution (0.4 × 0.4 × 3.5 µm voxel) monitoring of cell movement within the scaffolds. Two pancreatic cancer cell lines with known differing invasiveness were characterized on this platform, with median motilities of 14 ± 6 μm and 10 ± 4 μm over 48 h. Within the same cell line, cells demonstrated highly variable motility, with XYZ movement ranging from 144 μm to 2 μm over 24 h. The ten lowest and highest motility cells, with median movements of 33 ± 11 μm and 3 ± 1 μm, respectively, were separated and sub-cultured. After 6 weeks of culture, the cell populations were assayed on a Transwell invasion assay and 227 ± 56 cells were invasive in the high motility population while only 48 ± 10 cells were invasive in the low motility population, indicating that the resulting offspring possessed a motility phenotype reflective of the parental cells. This work demonstrates the feasibility of sorting single cells based on complex phenotypes along with the capability to further probe those cells and explore biological phenomena.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.