Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32083241›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2019

The perspective of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis on the journey from symptom onset until referral to a rheumatologist.

Diederik De Cock, Kristien Van der Elst, Veerle Stouten, Donna Peerboom, Johan Joly, Rene Westhovens, Patrick Verschueren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Barriers to the Diagnosis of Early Inflammatory Arthritis: A Literature Review.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diederik De CockDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kristien Van der ElstDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Veerle StoutenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Donna PeerboomDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan JolyDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rene WesthovensDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Patrick VerschuerenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTimely treatment of patients with early RA (ERA) favours a beneficial disease outcome. However, individuals often delay their contact with a health-care professional (HCP) after ERA-related symptom onset. The aim of this study was to investigate the perspective of patients on the journey of a patient from RA symptom onset until referral to a specialist.

methodsA subgroup of patients with ERA from the Care in ERA (CareRA) trial were interviewed retrospectively to discuss their initial ERA-related experiences preceding diagnosis, using a bespoke assessment form. The first section of the form focused on initial symptoms and help-seeking behaviour by the patients. The second part probed the actions of the HCPs consulted. Additional notes derived from the patient stories were analysed thematically.

resultsAmong 94 patients, pain (97%), swelling (73%) and stiffness (52%), typically in multiple joints, were reported as initial ERA symptoms. The general practitioner (GP) was generally the first HCP to be contacted (87%). Frequently reported reasons to visit an HCP were intense pain (90.4%) and difficulties in performing daily activities (69%). In 44.1% of patients, the HCP suspected ERA at the first visit. Approximately 25% of patients needed more than five visits before detection of ERA. GPs mainly referred patients to rheumatologists (71%). Thematic analysis uncovered that multiple HCPs were often involved in the journey to RA detection and referral.

conclusionPain is the most commonly reported initial symptom of ERA and the main reason to visit an HCP, usually a GP. These GPs play a pivotal role in early detection and correct referral. Furthermore, the journey of a patient seems complex, often with multiple HCPs being involved.

Indexed as

general practitionerpatient perspectivepatient trajectoryreferral pathwayrheumatoid arthritistreatment delay

Identifiers

PMID32083241
PMCPMC7018614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.