Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32083220›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2020

Design of a randomized controlled phase III study of dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (dd-MVAC) or gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) as peri-operative chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced transitional cell cancer of the bladder. The French GETUG/AFU V05 VESPER trial.

Christian Pfister, Valentin Harter, Yves Allory, François Radvanyi, Stéphane Culine, VESPER Trial Investigators

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Clinical Perspectives of ERCC1 in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.

Christian PfisterDepartment of Urology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Valentin HarterDepartment of Biostatistics, Baclesse Unicancer Center, Caen, France.
Yves AlloryDepartment of Pathology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France.
François RadvanyiUMR144 CNRS Laboratory, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Stéphane CulineDepartment of Medical Oncology, Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France.
VESPER Trial Investigators
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor · FRBiotherapy of Genetic Diseases, Inflammatory Disorders and Cancers · FRCentre de Recherche en Automatique de Nancy · FRCentre Eugène Marquis · FRCentre François Baclesse · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne · FRCentre Jean Perrin · FRDélégation Centre-Est · FRHôpital Lapeyronie · FRHôpital Rangueil · FRInserm · FRInstitut Bergonié · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of the French GETUG/AFU V05 VESPER randomized phase III study was to assess the efficacy of dd-MVAC and GC in term of progression-free survival in patients for whom chemotherapy has been decided, before or after surgery. A total of 500 patients have been randomized in 28 reference centers. Inclusion criteria were urothelial carcinoma without neuro-endocrine variant, disease defined by a T2, T3 or T4a N0 (pelvic lymph node ≤ 10 mm on CT scan) M0 staging for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or pT3 or pT4 or pN+ and M0 for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, safety, response rate. The peri-operative chemotherapy schedule was experimental arm dd-MVAC for a total of 6 cycles versus standard arm GC 4 cycles. The toxicity was evaluated according to NCI CTCAE (v 4.0). The progression-free survival rate will be estimated at 3 years by the Kaplan-Meier method. All the patients will be followed for 5 years. The last patient was randomized in March 2018 and the primary endpoint results are expected for mid-2021. As the dd-MVAC schedule is associated with higher response rates in metastatic disease, the real question today is to confirm such benefit in the peri-operative setting, taking also in consideration the chemotherapy toxicity. Tomorrow, the challenge may be the best chemotherapy and immunotherapy association, the authors hope that final Vesper Trial results will help to determine the gold standard chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Bladder cancerPeri-operative chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32083220
PMCPMC7025084
OpenAlexW3003550806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.