ArticleHeliyon2019
Neural correlates of visual short-term memory for objects with material categories.
Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Material constancy in perception and working memory.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- The limited contribution of early visual cortex in visual working memory for surface roughness.Experimental brain research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Behavioral and neuroscience studies have shown that we can easily identify material categories, such as metal and fabric. Not only the early visual areas but also higher-order visual areas including the fusiform gyrus are known to be engaged in material perception. However, the brain mechanisms underlying visual short-term memory (VSTM) for material categories are unknown. To address this issue, we examined the neural correlates of VSTM for objects with material categories using a change detection task. In each trial, participants viewed a sample display containing two, four, or six objects having six material categories and were required to remember the locations and types of objects. After a brief delay, participants were asked to detect an object change based on the images or material categories in the test display (image-based and material-based conditions). Neuronal activity in the brain was assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Behavioral results showed that the number of objects encoded did not increase as a function of set size in either image-based or material-based conditions. By contrast, MRI data showed a difference between the image-based and material-based conditions in percent signal change observed in a priori region of interest, the fusiform face area (FFA). Thus, we failed to achieve our research aim. However, the brain activation in the FFA correlated with the activation in the precentral/postcentral gyrus, which is related to haptic processing. Our findings indicate that the FFA may be involved in VSTM for objects with material categories in terms of the difference between images and material categories and that this memory may be mediated by the tactile properties of objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.