Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32083193›Full record

ArticleSynthetic and systems biotechnology2020

Designing chimeric enzymes inspired by fungal cellulosomes.

Sean P Gilmore, Stephen P Lillington, Charles H Haitjema, Randall de Groot, Michelle A O'Malley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Engineering cellulases for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Mapping the deformability of natural and designed cellulosomes in solution.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean P GilmoreDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States.
Stephen P LillingtonDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States.
Charles H HaitjemaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States.
Randall de GrootDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States.
Michelle A O'MalleyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, United States.
University of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulosomes are synthesized by anaerobic bacteria and fungi to degrade lignocellulose via synergistic action of multiple enzymes fused to a protein scaffold. Through templating key protein domains (cohesin and dockerin), designer cellulosomes have been engineered from bacterial motifs to alter the activity, stability, and degradation efficiency of enzyme complexes. Recently a parts list for fungal cellulosomes from the anaerobic fungi (

Indexed as

Anaerobic fungiBSA, Bovine serum albuminCellulosomeCMC, Carboxymethyl celluloseDDP, Dockerin domain proteinDNS, DinitrosalicylateDockerinEnzymeGH, Glycoside hydrolaseIPTG, Isopropyl-β- d-thiogalactopyranosidepNPG, p-Nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranosideScaffoldinThermophile

Identifiers

PMID32083193
PMCPMC7015840
OpenAlexW3005511223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.