Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32083066›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2019

First Field Release of a Genetically Engineered, Self-Limiting Agricultural Pest Insect: Evaluating Its Potential for Future Crop Protection.

Anthony M Shelton, Stefan J Long, Adam S Walker, Michael Bolton, Hilda L Collins, Loïc Revuelta, Lynn M Johnson, Neil I Morrison

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Downregulation of APN1 andApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Evaluation of AdditionalFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anthony M SheltonDepartment of Entomology, AgriTech, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, United States.
Stefan J LongDepartment of Entomology, AgriTech, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, United States.
Adam S WalkerOxitec Ltd, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Michael BoltonOxitec Ltd, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Hilda L CollinsDepartment of Entomology, AgriTech, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, United States.
Loïc RevueltaOxitec Ltd, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Lynn M JohnsonCornell Statistical Consulting Unit, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Neil I MorrisonOxitec Ltd, Milton Park, Abingdon, United Kingdom.
Cornell University · USOxitec (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative, biologically-based approaches for pest management are sorely needed and one approach is to use genetically engineered insects. Herein we describe a series of integrated field, laboratory and modeling studies with the diamondback moth,

Indexed as

biotechnologyengineeredinsectPlutellatransgenic

Identifiers

PMID32083066
PMCPMC7000757
OpenAlexW3003475626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.