ArticleTurk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi2018
Effectiveness, success rates, and complications of different thoracoscopic sympathectomy techniques in patients with palmar hyperhidrosis.
Article in Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic sympathectomy impairs forearm cutaneous vascular conductance and sweating responses during passive whole body heat stress.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026Article
- Observational
- Effect of Radiofrequency Ablation and Comparison With Surgical Sympathectomy in Palmar Hyperhidrosis.Cureus · 2025Article
- Post-Sympathectomy Care in Patients with Incessant Ventricular Tachycardia: A Case Study.International medical case reports journal · 2024Article
- Retroperitoneoscopic lumbar sympathectomy for the treatment of primary plantar hyperhidrosis.BMC surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to investigate the effectiveness, success and complication rates of three different video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy procedures performed for the treatment of primary focal hyperhidrosis; excision, cauterization and clipping.
methodsWe retrospectively evaluated the records of 60 patients (33 males, 27 females; mean age 25.1±6.4 years; range 16 to 43 years) with primary focal hyperhidrosis and treated with videoassisted thoracoscopic sympathectomy between January 2010 and December 2013. The patients were treated bilaterally at the same session: the sympathetic chain and ganglia were excised from the spinal cord segments of T2-T4 in 20 patients (group 1), cauterized in 20 patients (group 2), and clipped in 20 patients (group 3). The procedural success and complication rates were compared among the groups.
resultsSympathectomy was successfully performed in all patients. The mean operation time was found to be significantly shorter in group 2 (42.5±7.1 min) and group 3 (36.9±7.8 min), compared to group 1 (51.1±8.4 min) (p<0.05). Compensatory hyperhidrosis developed in 17 patients (28.3%) and was comparable among all groups (p<0.05).
conclusionOur study results suggest that excision, cauterization, and clipping are effective and reliable in the treatment of primary focal hyperhidrosis. Based on our experience, we believe that sympathectomy with video-assisted excision may be preferable for the treatment of primary focal hyperhidrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.