Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32082607›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2020

Impact of bariatric surgery on cerebral vascular reactivity and cognitive function: a non-randomized pilot study.

Wesley J Tucker, Binu P Thomas, Nancy Puzziferri, T Jake Samuel, Vlad G Zaha, Ildiko Lingvay, Jaime Almandoz, Jing Wang, Edward A Gonzales, R Matthew Brothers and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Brain effect of bariatric surgery in people with obesity.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cerebrovascular reactivity delay measured by blood oxygen level dependent magnetic resonance imaging and gas challenges: A systematic review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wesley J Tucker *1Applied Physiology and Advanced Imaging Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Science & Engineering Innovation & Research Building, 701 S. Nedderman Drive, Room 105, Arlington, TX 76019 USA.
Binu P Thomas *3Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA.
Nancy Puzziferri5Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR USA.
T Jake Samuel1Applied Physiology and Advanced Imaging Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Science & Engineering Innovation & Research Building, 701 S. Nedderman Drive, Room 105, Arlington, TX 76019 USA.
Vlad G Zaha3Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA.
Ildiko Lingvay7Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA.
Jaime Almandoz7Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA.
Jing Wang8College of Nursing and Health Innovation, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX USA.
Edward A Gonzales1Applied Physiology and Advanced Imaging Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Science & Engineering Innovation & Research Building, 701 S. Nedderman Drive, Room 105, Arlington, TX 76019 USA.
R Matthew Brothers *1Applied Physiology and Advanced Imaging Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Science & Engineering Innovation & Research Building, 701 S. Nedderman Drive, Room 105, Arlington, TX 76019 USA.
Michael D Nelson *1Applied Physiology and Advanced Imaging Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, Science & Engineering Innovation & Research Building, 701 S. Nedderman Drive, Room 105, Arlington, TX 76019 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3232-8639
The University of Texas at Arlington · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USTexas Woman's University · US

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBariatric surgery is an effective long-term weight loss strategy yielding improvements in neurocognitive function; however, the mechanism(s) responsible for these improvements remains unclear. Here, we assessed the feasibility of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate whether cerebral vascular reactivity (CVR) is impaired in severely obese bariatric surgery candidates compared with normal weight healthy controls and whether CVR improves following bariatric surgery. We also investigated whether changes in CVR were associated with changes in cognitive function.

methodsBariatric surgery candidates (

resultsCompliance with the CVR protocol was high. Both macro- and micro-cerebrovascular function were highest in the young reference controls. Cognitive function was lower in obese bariatric surgery candidates compared with normal weight controls, and improved by 17% at 2 weeks and 21% by 14 weeks following bariatric surgery. To our surprise, whole-brain CVR BOLD did not differ between obese bariatric surgery candidates and normal weight controls of similar age (0.184 ± 0.101 vs. 0.192 ± 0.034 %BOLD/mmHgCO

conclusionsAssessing CVR responses to a hypercapnic challenge with MRI was feasible in severely obese bariatric patients. However, no changes in whole-brain BOLD CVR were observed following bariatric surgery despite improvements in cognitive function. We recommend that future large trials assess CVR responses to cognitive tasks (rather than hypercapnia) to better define the mechanisms responsible for cognitive function improvements following bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

BOLD MRIHypercapniaMiddle cerebral artery dilationObesitySleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID32082607
PMCPMC7017515
OpenAlexW3012696285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.