Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32082564›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2020

Inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients: Prevalence, causes and interventions.

B E L Vrijsen, C A Naaktgeboren, L M Vos, W W van Solinge, H A H Kaasjager, M J Ten Berg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Probabilistic Prediction of Laboratory Test Information Yield.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Laboratory Demand Management Strategies-An Overview.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B E L VrijsenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Internal Medicine, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
C A NaaktgeborenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
L M VosUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Internal Medicine, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
W W van SolingeUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
H A H KaasjagerUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Internal Medicine, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
M J Ten BergUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo reduce overutilization of laboratory testing many interventions have been tried, but selecting the most effective intervention for a given setting is challenging. To be sustainable, interventions need to align with healthcare providers' needs and daily practices. This study aimed to assess the extent of overutilization and the perspectives of healthcare providers, which may be used to guide the choice of intervention.

methodsThe extent of inappropriate laboratory testing in internal medicine inpatients was evaluated using a database. Surveys and focus groups were used to investigate healthcare providers' perceptions on its causes and solutions.

resultsOn average, patients had 5.7 laboratory orders done during the first week of admission, whereas guidelines advise performing laboratory testing no more than twice per week. Repeat testing of normal test results occurred in up to 85% of patients. The frequency of laboratory testing was underestimated by survey responders, even though the majority of responders (78%) thought that laboratory tests are ordered too frequently. Residents were considered to be most responsible for laboratory test ordering.The primary causes of overutilization discussed were personal factors, such as a lack of awareness and knowledge, as well as feelings of insecurity. Regarding possible solutions, residents generally recommended educational interventions, whereas specialists tended to favour technical solutions such as lockouts.

conclusionInappropriate laboratory testing is common in internal medicine. The most important causes are a lack of awareness and knowledge, especially in residents. The intervention most favoured by residents is education, suggesting educational interventions may be most applicable.

Indexed as

Internal medicineLaboratory medicineOvertestingOverutilization

Identifiers

PMID32082564
PMCPMC7021522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.