ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2020
Platelet-rich Plasma, Collagen Peptides, and Stem Cells for Cutaneous Rejuvenation.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Periorbital Rejuvenation.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Mitochondria-Targeted Biophysical Priming of Autologous Biologics for Skin Regeneration and Wound Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Public awareness and understanding of stem cell treatments available in Saudi Arabia and their trust in hospitals and research centers involved in stem cell research-a cross sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Multifunctional PDO Thread Coated with Mg(OH)Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Publication Frequency and Google Trends Analysis of Popular Alternative Treatments to Arthritis.Arthroplasty today · 2022Article
- Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Facial Rejuvenation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Stem cells and the pursuit of youth, a tale of limitless possibilities and commercial fraud.World journal of biological chemistry · 2021Review
- Pathogenesis and multidisciplinary management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.International journal of oral science · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, platelet-rich plasma (PRP), collagen peptides, and stem cells have become popular treatments for cutaneous rejuvenation. Mass marketing to consumers via the internet and social media has attracted the attention of the aesthetics industry to these treatments. However, the studies behind these treatment modalities have not supported the often exaggerated claims of effectiveness that have targeted consumers. It is important for clinicians to understand the evidence behind any new trends, especially in the fast-paced world of aesthetics, where treatments often outpace current medical understanding. Here, we summarize and evaluate the current prominent literature on these popular aesthetic treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32082473PMC7028374What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.