Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32082464›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2020

Adherence to omalizumab: A multicenter "real-world" study.

Raffaele Campisi, Claudia Crimi, Rossella Intravaia, Simona Strano, Alberto Noto, Maria Pia Foschino, Giuseppe Valenti, Vittorio Viviano, Corrado Pelaia, Luisa Ricciardi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An Overview of Adherence-What It Is and Why It Is Important.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Economic burden of severe asthma treatment: A real-life study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Raffaele CampisiRespiratory Medicine Unit, A.O.U. "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Catania, Italy.
Claudia CrimiRespiratory Medicine Unit, A.O.U. "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Catania, Italy.
Rossella IntravaiaRespiratory Medicine Unit, A.O.U. "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Simona StranoRespiratory Medicine Unit, A.O.U. "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Alberto NotoAnesthesia and Critical Care, A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Martino", Messina, Italy.
Maria Pia FoschinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, "Institute of Respiratory Diseases", Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giuseppe ValentiAllergy and Pulmonary Unit - Center for Severe Asthma - ASP Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Vittorio VivianoAllergy and Pulmonary Unit - Center for Severe Asthma - ASP Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Corrado PelaiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia", Catanzaro Italy.
Luisa RicciardiAllergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, A.O.U. Policlinico "G. Martino", Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Nicola ScichiloneDepartment of Biomedicine and Internal and Specialistic Medicine (DIBIMIS), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Nunzio CrimiRespiratory Medicine Unit, A.O.U. "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to medications is crucial in patients with severe asthma in light of the negative clinical impact and costs of non-adherence. Adherence to omalizumab has not been well studied in real-world settings. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to omalizumab and evaluate treatment effectiveness in relation to adherence.

methodsThis was a retrospective, observational, and multicenter real-world study. Omalizumab dose, timing of administration, and duration of treatment (<2 years; 2-4 years; > 4 years) were analyzed. Adherence was evaluated by examining rates of expected and missing doses. Good adherence (<10% of doses missed) and poor adherence (>10% doses missed) were determined. For effectiveness in relation to adherence of omalizumab we considered asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, asthma control test (ACT), and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV

resultsA total of 196 patients were evaluated, and 161 were suitable for data analyses. Good adherence was shown in 90.7% of patients and poor adherence in 9.3%. Considering adherence in relation to treatment duration: <2 years, 87.8% of patients were adherent (expected doses, 1186; missed doses, 53); 2-4 years, 85.9% were adherent (expected doses, 2985; missed doses, 127); >4 years, 100% were adherent (expected doses, 6120; missed doses, none). Indices of efficacy between pre- and post-treatment showed significant improvement (p < 0.001). The effectiveness indices between pre- and post-treatment, among adherent and non-adherent patients, ACT, and asthma exacerbations both showed significant differences (p = 0.043 and p = 0.049, respectively). Binomial logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age, better ACT score, and 14-day timing were significantly associated with increased adherence to therapy.

conclusionsHigh adherence to omalizumab was demonstrated in a real-world setting, which was associated with better outcomes and control of asthma.

Indexed as

AdherenceEfficacyOmalizumabReal-worldSevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID32082464
PMCPMC7016448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.