ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2020
Adherence to omalizumab: A multicenter "real-world" study.
Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and Tolerability of Twice-Yearly Depemokimab in Patients with Asthma and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: Pooled Results from SWIFT-1/-2 and ANCHOR-1/-2.Advances in therapy · 2026Trial
- Relationship between knowledge, adherence-related behaviors and self-management with response to monoclonal antibody therapy in patients with severe asthma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Case for Anti-IgE Vaccination.Allergy · 2026Review
- Adherence to Biologic Therapies is Associated with Improved Clinical Outcomes and Reduced Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Severe Asthma in Japan.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Disparities in the Field of Precision Medicine: A Perspective.Health science reports · 2025Article
- An Overview of Adherence-What It Is and Why It Is Important.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024Review
- Unlocking Better Asthma Control: A Narrative Review of Adherence to Asthma Therapy and Innovative Monitoring Solutions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Predictive model to differentiate chronic histaminergic angioedema and chronic spontaneous urticaria with angioedema.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2024Article
- Difficult-To-Treat and Severe Asthma: Can Real-World Studies On Effectiveness of Biological Treatments Change the Lives of Patients?Pragmatic and observational research · 2024Review
- Patient and physician perspectives on biological treatment in severe asthma: a Severe Asthma Network Italy survey.ERJ open research · 2023Article
- Personalized Medicine in Asthma: Current Approach and Future Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Barrier Factors of Adherence to Dupilumab Self-Injection for Severe Allergic Disease: A Non-Interventional Open-Label Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2023Article
- Bronchial Asthma as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor: A Prospective Observational Study.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Economic burden of severe asthma treatment: A real-life study.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2022Article
- Novel Biological Therapies for Severe Asthma Endotypes.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Omalizumab and IgE in the Control of Severe Allergic Asthma.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Characteristics of new adult users of mepolizumab with asthma in the USA.BMJ open respiratory research · 2021Observational
- Adherence to Asthma Biologics: Implications for Patient Selection, Step Therapy, and Outcomes.Chest · 2021Article
- Real-World Experience with Dupilumab in Severe Asthma: One-Year Data from an Italian Named Patient Program.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2021Article
- Molecular Targets for Biological Therapies of Severe Asthma.Frontiers in immunology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherence to medications is crucial in patients with severe asthma in light of the negative clinical impact and costs of non-adherence. Adherence to omalizumab has not been well studied in real-world settings. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to omalizumab and evaluate treatment effectiveness in relation to adherence.
methodsThis was a retrospective, observational, and multicenter real-world study. Omalizumab dose, timing of administration, and duration of treatment (<2 years; 2-4 years; > 4 years) were analyzed. Adherence was evaluated by examining rates of expected and missing doses. Good adherence (<10% of doses missed) and poor adherence (>10% doses missed) were determined. For effectiveness in relation to adherence of omalizumab we considered asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, asthma control test (ACT), and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV
resultsA total of 196 patients were evaluated, and 161 were suitable for data analyses. Good adherence was shown in 90.7% of patients and poor adherence in 9.3%. Considering adherence in relation to treatment duration: <2 years, 87.8% of patients were adherent (expected doses, 1186; missed doses, 53); 2-4 years, 85.9% were adherent (expected doses, 2985; missed doses, 127); >4 years, 100% were adherent (expected doses, 6120; missed doses, none). Indices of efficacy between pre- and post-treatment showed significant improvement (p < 0.001). The effectiveness indices between pre- and post-treatment, among adherent and non-adherent patients, ACT, and asthma exacerbations both showed significant differences (p = 0.043 and p = 0.049, respectively). Binomial logistic regression analysis showed that increasing age, better ACT score, and 14-day timing were significantly associated with increased adherence to therapy.
conclusionsHigh adherence to omalizumab was demonstrated in a real-world setting, which was associated with better outcomes and control of asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.