Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32082308›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2020

Functions of Tfh Cells in Common Variable Immunodeficiency.

Corentin Le Saos-Patrinos, Séverine Loizon, Patrick Blanco, Jean-François Viallard, Dorothée Duluc

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Clinical utility of measuring CD4Journal of autoimmunity · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antigen-Specific CD4Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Corentin Le Saos-PatrinosImmunoConcEpT, CNRS-UMR 5164 and Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Séverine LoizonImmunoConcEpT, CNRS-UMR 5164 and Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Patrick BlancoImmunoConcEpT, CNRS-UMR 5164 and Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-François ViallardCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Service de Médecine Interne, Hôpital du Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France.
Dorothée DulucImmunoConcEpT, CNRS-UMR 5164 and Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common variable immunodeficiency is the most common clinical primary immunodeficiency in adults. Its hallmarks are hypogammaglobulinemia and compromised B-cell differentiation into memory or antibody-secreting cells leading to recurrent infections. This disease is heterogeneous, with some patients harboring multiple complications such as lymphoproliferative disorders, autoimmune manifestations, or granulomatous inflammation. The mechanisms leading to these complications remain elusive despite numerous associations found in the literature. For instance, although described as a B cell intrinsic disease, numerous abnormalities have been reported in other immune cell compartments. Here, we tuned our attention to follicular helper T cells, a CD4

Indexed as

AdultAnimalsB-LymphocytesChildChild, PreschoolCommon Variable ImmunodeficiencyHumansLymphocyte ActivationMiceT Follicular Helper CellsB cellscomplicationsCVIDfollicular helper T cellsIFNγ

Identifiers

PMID32082308
PMCPMC7002358
OpenAlexW3004340011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.