Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32082200›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2019

A History of the Alexithymia Concept and Its Explanatory Models: An Epistemological Perspective.

Francisco López-Muñoz, Francisco Pérez-Fernández

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Anxiety, depression and acromegaly: a systematic review.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Alexithymia and asthma: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Hormonal abnormalities in alexithymia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontotemporal Dementia: A Window to Alexithymia.The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  15. How Does Our Brain Generate Sexual Pleasure?International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2021
    Article
  16. Alexithymia in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francisco López-MuñozDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Health, University Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Pérez-FernándezDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Health, University Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alexithymia, as a theoretical psychotherapeutic construct, finds its origins in psychosomatic medicine, actually being quite old. However, beyond the specific observations and case studies, their characterization and systematization is relatively recent. However, from an epistemological point of view, it remains the subject of debate and therefore remains outside the conventional diagnostic guidelines. Possibly, its history, closely linked to psychoanalysis, as well as the lack of clear empirical references, has turned the alexithymia construct before into a good descriptive and comprehensive framework than in a precise diagnostic model. In this article it is, following the thread conduits of the historical perspective, to deepen these epistemological aspects.

Indexed as

alexithymiahistorypsychosomatic medicinetheoretical constructstherapeutic models

Identifiers

PMID32082200
PMCPMC7005782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.