Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32082010›Full record

ArticleMedical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)2019

Uric Acid Values Along with Doppler Sonography Findings as a Tool for Preeclampsia Screening.

Edin Medjedovic, Alma Suljevic, Amer Iglica, Admir Rama, Emir Mahmutbegovic, Amela Muftic, Ema Dzihic

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edin MedjedovicClinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Alma SuljevicDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, General Hospital, Konjic, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Amer IglicaIntensive Care Unit, Clinic for Heart, Blood Vessel and Rheumatic Diseases, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Admir RamaBahceci IVF Center, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Emir MahmutbegovicDepartment of Gynecology, Health Care Center Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Amela MufticClinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Ema DzihicClinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Clinical Center University of Sarajevo · BAUniversity of Sarajevo · BA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreeclampsia is defined as hypertension (systolic pressure ≥140 mmHg or diastolic pressure ≥90 mmHg) after week 20 of gestation with one or more of the following symptoms: proteinuria, organ dysfunction (including renal, hepatologic, hematologic or neurological complications) and in case of stagnation of fetal development. So far, there are no valid clinical tools or tests that can tell with sufficient sensitivity and specificity in early pregnancy which pregnant woman will develop preeclampsia or have unwanted outcomes.

aimTo present the properties of biochemical parameter, uric acid, in patients with signs of preclampsia, which was confirmed by Doppler sonography.

methodsThe study included 60 female subjects in the second trimester of pregnancy who were examined or were hospitalized at the Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo. Pregnant women who had normal Doppler sonography scan of the uterine arteries in the second trimester of pregnancy were included in the control group, while pregnant women with pathologic Doppler sonographic findings in the second trimester of pregnancy were included in the group of pregnant women at risk of preeclampsia, i.e. the study group.

resultsThere is statistically significant difference between the average value of uric acid in the control and in the study group (213.36 ± 28.96 μmol / L vs 249.73 ± 47.06 μmol / L) (F = 12.991; p = 0.001). Applying the Wilcoxon non-parametric paired test to the average uric acid values during all measurements within the control group, no statistically significant difference was found. There was a statistically significant increase in the study group between all measurements, from 18.04 μmol / L between the first and second measurement (Z = -1.955; p = 0.043), 29.10 μmol / L between the second and third measurement (Z = -2.973; p = 0.003), 37.27 μmol / L between the third and fourth measurement (Z = -4.325; p = 0.001) and 109.87 μmol / L at the end of the study in comparison to values from the start of the study (Z = -4.309; p = 0.001).

conclusionUric acid values should become part of a broad biochemical range in screening and optimizing the treatment of patients diagnosed with early preeclampsia.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPre-EclampsiaPregnancyProspective StudiesUltrasonography, DopplerUltrasonography, PrenatalUric AcidUterine ArteryUric Acidpreeclampsiascreeninguric acid

Identifiers

PMID32082010
PMCPMC7007614
OpenAlexW2997437753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.