Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32081946›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Fecal bacteria and metabolite responses to dietary lysozyme in a sow model from late gestation until lactation.

Shengyu Xu, Jiankai Shi, Yanpeng Dong, Zimei Li, Xiaoling Wu, Yan Lin, Lianqiang Che, Jian Li, Bin Feng, Zhengfeng Fang and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shengyu Xu *Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China. shengyu_x@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4415-8542
Jiankai Shi *Animal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Yanpeng DongAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Zimei LiAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Xiaoling WuAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Yan LinAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Lianqiang CheAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Jian LiAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Bin FengAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Zhengfeng FangAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Yong ZhuoAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Jianping WangAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
De WuAnimal Nutrition Institute, Sichuan Agricultural University, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Education, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Key laboratory of Animal Disease-resistant Nutrition, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, 611130, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Zhihua RenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Sichuan Province Key Laboratory of Animal Disease and Human Health, Key Laboratory of Environmental Hazard and Human Health of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, 611130, P. R. China.
Yanping ShenShanghai Longyou Biotechnology Co, Ltd, Shanghai, 200000, P. R. China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CNShanghai Liangyou (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lysozyme (LZM) is a natural anti-bacterial protein that is found in the saliva, tears and milk of all mammals including humans. Its anti-bacterial properties result from the ability to cleave bacterial cell walls, causing bacterial death. The current study was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary LZM on fecal microbial composition and variation in metabolites in sow. The addition of LZM decreased the fecal short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs). Zonulin and endotoxin in the serum, and feces, were decreased with lysozyme supplementation. Furthermore, fecal concentrations of lipocalin-2 and the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α were also decreased while the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 was increased by lysozyme supplementation. 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the V3-V4 region suggested that fecal microbial levels changed at different taxonomic levels with the addition of LZM. Representative changes included the reduction of diversity between sows, decreased Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Tenericutes and Spirochaetes during lactation as well as an increase in Lactobacillus. These findings suggest that dietary lysozyme supplementation from late gestation to lactation promote microbial changes, which would potentially be the mechanisms by which maternal metabolites and inflammatory status was altered after LZM supplementation.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaAnimal FeedAnimalsBacteriaBacteroidetesDietDietary SupplementsFatty Acids, VolatileFecesFemaleInflammationInterleukin-10LactationLipocalin-2MuramidaseRNA, Ribosomal, 16SFatty Acids, VolatileInterleukin-10Lipocalin-2MuramidaseRNA, Ribosomal, 16STumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID32081946
PMCPMC7035255
OpenAlexW3007106265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.