Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32081901›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

The effects of NMDA receptor blockade on TMS-evoked EEG potentials from prefrontal and parietal cortex.

Nigel C Rogasch, Carl Zipser, Ghazaleh Darmani, Tuomas P Mutanen, Mana Biabani, Christoph Zrenner, Debora Desideri, Paolo Belardinelli, Florian Müller-Dahlhaus, Ulf Ziemann

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Disinhibition across Secondary Motor Cortical Regions during Motor Sequence Learning: A TMS-EEG Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Influence of Large-Scale Brain State Dynamics on the Evoked Response to Brain Stimulation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reliability and Validity of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography Biomarkers.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Synaptic Plasticity 101: The Story of the AMPA Receptor for the Brain Stimulation Practitioner.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Nigel C RogaschBrain, Mind and Society Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. nigel.rogasch@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4484-1069
Carl ZipserDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ghazaleh DarmaniDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Tuomas P MutanenCentre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Mana BiabaniBrain, Mind and Society Research Hub, School of Psychological Sciences and Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Christoph ZrennerDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Debora DesideriDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Paolo BelardinelliDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9290-1804
Florian Müller-Dahlhaus *Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ulf Ziemann *Department of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8372-3615
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEMonash University · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AUWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the brain's response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography (EEG) offers unique insights into the cortical circuits activated following stimulation, particularly in non-motor regions where less is known about TMS physiology. However, the mechanisms underlying TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) remain largely unknown. We assessed TEP sensitivity to changes in excitatory neurotransmission mediated by n-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors following stimulation of non-motor regions. In fourteen male volunteers, resting EEG and TEPs from prefrontal (PFC) and parietal (PAR) cortex were measured before and after administration of either dextromethorphan (NMDA receptor antagonist) or placebo across two sessions in a double-blinded pseudo-randomised crossover design. At baseline, there were amplitude differences between PFC and PAR TEPs across a wide time range (15-250 ms), however the signals were correlated after ~80 ms, suggesting early peaks reflect site-specific activity, whereas late peaks reflect activity patterns less dependent on the stimulated sites. Early TEP peaks were not reliably altered following dextromethorphan compared to placebo, although findings were less clear for later peaks, and low frequency resting oscillations were reduced in power. Our findings suggest that early TEP peaks (<80 ms) from PFC and PAR reflect stimulation site specific activity that is largely insensitive to changes in NMDA receptor-mediated neurotransmission.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultBayes TheoremCross-Over StudiesDextromethorphanDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeurosciencesParietal LobePrefrontal CortexReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateYoung AdultDextromethorphanReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID32081901
PMCPMC7035341
OpenAlexW3008169983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.