Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32081890›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Purging of highly deleterious mutations through severe bottlenecks in Alpine ibex.

Christine Grossen, Frédéric Guillaume, Lukas F Keller, Daniel Croll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 153 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Repeated genetic adaptation under demographic limits in kiwifruit.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nucleotide diversity is a poor predictor of short-term adaptive potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. On the Use of the Jackknife to Compare RMolecular ecology resources · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine GrossenDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland. christine.grossen@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4157-1910
Frédéric GuillaumeDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lukas F KellerDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0149-0174
Daniel CrollLaboratory of Evolutionary Genetics, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, CH-2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. daniel.croll@unine.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2072-380X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activity has caused dramatic population declines in many wild species. The resulting bottlenecks have a profound impact on the genetic makeup of a species with unknown consequences for health. A key genetic factor for species survival is the evolution of deleterious mutation load, but how bottleneck strength and mutation load interact lacks empirical evidence. We analyze 60 complete genomes of six ibex species and the domestic goat. We show that historic bottlenecks rather than the current conservation status predict levels of genome-wide variation. By analyzing the exceptionally well-characterized population bottlenecks of the once nearly extinct Alpine ibex, we find genomic evidence of concurrent purging of highly deleterious mutations but accumulation of mildly deleterious mutations. This suggests that recolonization bottlenecks induced both relaxed selection and purging, thus reshaping the landscape of deleterious mutation load. Our findings highlight that even populations of ~1000 individuals can accumulate mildly deleterious mutations. Conservation efforts should focus on preventing population declines below such levels to ensure long-term survival of species.

Indexed as

MutationAnimalsAnimals, WildComputer SimulationConservation of Natural ResourcesEvolution, MolecularGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationGenomeGoatsModels, GeneticSpecies SpecificityTundra

Identifiers

PMID32081890
PMCPMC7035315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.