Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080883›Full record

GuidelineJournal of oral rehabilitation2020

Occlusal dysesthesia-A clinical guideline.

Bruno Imhoff, M Oliver Ahlers, Alfons Hugger, Matthias Lange, Marc Schmitter, Peter Ottl, Anne Wolowski, Jens Christoph Türp

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Occlusal dysesthesia-A clinical guideline.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bruno ImhoffPrivate Practice, Cologne, Germany.
M Oliver AhlersDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry School of Dental Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, and CMD-Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9536-7259
Alfons HuggerDepartment for Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Matthias LangePrivate Practice, Berlin, Germany.
Marc SchmitterDepartment of Prosthodontics, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Peter OttlDepartment of Prosthodontics and Materials Science, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Anne WolowskiDepartment for Prosthodontics and Biomaterials, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Jens Christoph TürpDepartment of Oral Health & Medicine, University Center of Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9267-4317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis and management of patients suffering from occlusal dysesthesia (OD) remain a major challenge for dental practitioners and affected patients.

objectivesTo present the results of a literature-based expert consensus intended to promote better understanding of OD and to facilitate the identification and management of affected patients.

methodsIn 2018, electronic literature searches were carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar as well as in the archives of relevant journals not listed in these databases. This approach was complemented by a careful assessment of the reference lists of the identified relevant papers. The articles were weighted by evidence level, followed by an evaluation of their contents and a discussion. The result represents an expert consensus.

resultsBased on the contents of the 77 articles identified in the search, the current knowledge about clinical characteristics, epidemiology, aetiology, diagnostic process, differential diagnosis and management of OD is summarised.

conclusionsOcclusal dysesthesia exists independently of the occlusion. Instead, it is the result of maladaptive signal processing. The focus should be on patient education, counselling, defocusing, cognitive behavioural therapy, supportive drug therapy and certain non-specific measures. Irreversible, specifically an exclusively dental treatment approach must be avoided.

Indexed as

MalocclusionParesthesiaDental OcclusionDentistsHumansProfessional Rolefacial painmalocclusionoral health-related quality of lifephantom bite syndromesomatic symptom disorderstemporomandibular disorders

Identifiers

PMID32080883
PMCPMC7317831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.