Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080792›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Student Education About Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Varies Between Regions of the United States.

Samuel R Bunting, Sarah S Garber, Robert H Goldstein, Timothy D Ritchie, Tamzin J Batteson, Timothy J Keyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel R BuntingChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA. Samuel.Bunting@my.rfums.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2186-5460
Sarah S GarberPharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Robert H GoldsteinDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Timothy D RitchieDepartment of Psychology, Saint Xavier University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tamzin J BattesonDeWitt C. Baldwin Institute for Interprofessional Education, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Timothy J KeyesStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDaily, oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective and safe prevention strategy for people at risk for HIV. However, prescription of PrEP has been limited for patients at the highest risk. Disparities in PrEP prescription are pronounced among racial and gender minority patients. A significant body of literature indicates that practicing healthcare providers have little awareness and knowledge of PrEP. Very little work has investigated the education about PrEP among health professionals in training.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare health professions students' awareness of PrEP and education about PrEP between regions of the US, and to determine if correlations between regional HIV incidence and PrEP use were present.

designSurvey study.

participantsA cross-sectional sample of health professions students (N = 1859) representing future prescribers (MD, DO, PA), pharmacists, and nurses in the US. KEY

resultsOverall, 83.4% of students were aware of PrEP, but only 62.2% of fourth-year students indicated they had been taught about PrEP at any time during their training. Education about PrEP was most comprehensive in the Northeastern US, the area with the highest PrEP to need ratio (4.7). In all regions, transgender patients and heterosexual men and women were least likely to be presented in education as PrEP candidates, and men who have sex with men were the most frequently presented.

conclusionsThere are marked differences in education regarding PrEP both between academic programs and regions of the USA.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleStudentsUnited StatesAnti-HIV AgentsHealth professions educationHIVPre-exposure prophylaxisStudents

Identifiers

PMID32080792
PMCPMC7573046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.