ArticleNeurosurgical review2021
A novel surgical technique for spontaneous intracerebral hematoma evacuation.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical benefit of robot-assisted minimally invasive stereotactic aspiration/drainage in hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Neuroendoscopic Parafascicular Evacuation of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage (NESICH Technique): A Multicenter Technical Experience with Preliminary Findings.Neurology and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereotactic removal of intracerebral hematoma is a routine procedure for treating hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, but the complex sequence of operations limits its adoption. We explored the application of a novel surgical technique for the removal of spontaneous intracerebral hematomas. The surgical technique based on computed tomography (CT) images was used in hematoma projection and surgical planning. Markers placed on the scalp based on an Android smartphone app allowed the installation of a stereotactic head frame to facilitate the selection of the best trajectory to the hematoma center for removing the hematoma. Forty-two patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage were included in the study, including 33 cases of supratentorial hemorrhage, 5 cases of cerebellum hemorrhage, and 4 cases of brain stem hemorrhage. The surgical technique combined with the stereotactic head frame helped the tip of the drainage tube achieve the desired position. The median surgical time was 45 (range 25-75) min. The actual head frame operating time was 10 (range 5-15) min. Target alignment performed by the surgical technique was accurate to ≤ 10.0 mm in all 42 cases. No patient experienced postoperative rebleeding. In 33 cases of supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage, an average evacuation rate of 77.5% was achieved at postoperative 3.1 ± 1.4 days, and 29 (87.9%) cases had a residual hematoma of < 15 ml. The novel surgical technique helped to quickly and effortlessly localize hematomas and achieve satisfactory hematoma removal. Clinical application of the stereotactic head frame was feasible for intracerebral hemorrhage in various locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.