Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080765›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2020

Social Media in the Diabetes Community: a Novel Way to Assess Psychosocial Needs in People with Diabetes and Their Caregivers.

Tamara K Oser, Sean M Oser, Jessica A Parascando, Danielle Hessler-Jones, Christopher N Sciamanna, Kerri Sparling, Donald Nease, Michelle L Litchman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring X: barriers to care for eosinophilic esophagitis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  8. The Sugar-Coated Truth: The Quality of Diabetes Health Information on TikTok.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tamara K OserDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. tamara.oser@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0405-3420
Sean M OserDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Jessica A ParascandoDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Danielle Hessler-JonesDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Christopher N SciamannaDepartments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA.
Kerri SparlingSixUntilMe.com and KerriSparling.com, Narragansett, RI, USA.
Donald NeaseDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Avenue, Mail Stop F496, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Michelle L LitchmanCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDiabetes is a chronic disease that, regardless of type, requires intensive, ongoing self-management. As a result, people with diabetes (PWD) often have complex environmental, social, behavioral, and informational needs, many of which are unmet in healthcare settings and systems. To help meet these needs, many PWD interact with diabetes online communities (DOCs), including platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, and blogs, to share real-life support, problems, and concerns with other PWD, offering a rich source of data on patient-reported outcomes. This article reviews recent psychosocial needs and outcomes identified by studies of DOCs and/or their users. RECENT

findingsParticipation in DOCs appears driven by a need for psychosocial support, unmet by providers and the healthcare system, as well as a sense of duty to provide it to others. The most common activities observed in DOCs are giving and receiving various types of support: psychosocial, technical, informational, and self-management. General and specific challenges (e.g., continuous glucose monitoring) as well as frustrations and worries associated with those challenges are commonly expressed, leading to reciprocal sharing, support, and encouragement, in a judgment-free manner, from other PWD. This leads users to feel more understood, empowered, validated, less alone, and more supported. Negative findings were reported very rarely and focused more on how other participants used social media rather than on the exchange of misplaced or dangerous information or advice. Diabetes online communities have grown from unmet needs for problem-solving and psychosocial support for living with a complex condition and from the availability of a new communications medium (i.e., social media). This has enabled communities of peers to both seek and receive support for living with diabetes, providing an important supplement to what is provided in healthcare settings and offering valuable information about what is most important to PWD and their families, with the potential to improve psychosocial care.

Indexed as

Social MediaBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringCaregiversDiabetes MellitusHumansSelf-ManagementSocial SupportCaregiversPeer supportPsychosocial outcomesSocial mediaType 1 diabetesType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID32080765
OpenAlexW3008621581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.