Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080761›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2020

Re-evaluation of HER2 status in 606 breast cancers-gene protein assay on tissue microarrays versus routine pathological assessment.

Emma Sandén, Somayeh Khazaei, Helga Tryggvadottir, Signe Borgquist, Karolin Isaksson, Karin Jirström, Helena Jernström

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Improving HER2 testing reproducibility in HER2-low breast cancer.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma SandénDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University Cancer Center / Kamprad, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Somayeh KhazaeiDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University Cancer Center / Kamprad, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Helga TryggvadottirDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University Cancer Center / Kamprad, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Signe BorgquistDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University Cancer Center / Kamprad, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Karolin IsakssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University Cancer Center, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden, and Central Hospital Kristianstad, Kristianstad, Sweden.
Karin JirströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University Cancer Center / Kamprad, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Helena JernströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Oncology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University Cancer Center / Kamprad, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. helena.jernstrom@med.lu.se.
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

Cancerfonden 2017/368Fru Berta Kamprads Stiftelse 2017-4Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet NARegion Skåne 40620Skånes universitetssjukhus NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer is routinely determined through immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridisation (ISH) performed on whole tissue sections (WS). The purpose was to evaluate whether a gene protein assay (GPA) combining IHC with ISH, performed on breast cancer tissue microarray (TMA), is suitable for large-scale retrospective HER2 status evaluation. TMAs from 606 tumours from a Swedish population-based cohort (2005-2012) were stained with GPA. GPA IHC on TMA yielded weaker staining than IHC on WS during routine pathological assessment (86.0% agreement). However, final HER2 status agreement between GPA on TMA and WS based on both IHC and ISH was 97.7%. Only 14 tumours were discordant and one tumour with IHC score 1+ on both TMA and WS was HER2 amplified on TMA. In conclusion, GPA on TMA is suitable for large-scale retrospective evaluation of HER2 status.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTissue Array AnalysisBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesGene protein assayHER2ImmunohistochemistryIn situ hybridizationTissue microarrayWhole tissue section

Identifiers

PMID32080761
PMCPMC7371653
OpenAlexW3007963707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.