ArticleCommunications biology2020
Action execution and action observation elicit mirror responses with the same temporal profile in human SII.
Article in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding effects of observing affordance-driven action during motor imagery through EEG analysis.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- Simultaneous invasive and non-invasive recordings in humans: A novel Rosetta stone for deciphering brain activity.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024Review
- The multisensory and multidimensional nature of object representation.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Review
- Agreeableness modulates mental state decoding: Electrophysiological evidence.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- The importance of observing the master's hand: Action Observation Training promotes the acquisition of new musical skills.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Advances in human intracranial electroencephalography research, guidelines and good practices.NeuroImage · 2022Review
- Seeing a Bayesian ghost: Sensorimotor activation leads to an illusory social perception.iScience · 2022Article
- Photographs of Actions: What Makes Them Special Cues to Social Perception.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Neural Evidence of Mirror Self-Recognition in the Secondary Somatosensory Cortex of Macaque: Observations from a Single-Cell Recording Experiment and Implications for Consciousness.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Stereotyped, automatized and habitual behaviours: are they similar constructs under the control of the same cerebral areas?AIMS neuroscience · 2020Review
- La Recherche du Temps Perdu: Timing in Somatosensation. Commentary: Somatosensation in the Brain: A Theoretical Re-evaluation and a New Model.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The properties of the secondary somatosensory area (SII) have been described by many studies in monkeys and humans. Recent studies on monkeys, however, showed that beyond somatosensory stimuli, SII responds to a wider number of stimuli, a finding requiring a revision that human SII is purely sensorimotor. By recording cortical activity with stereotactic electroencephalography (stereo-EEG), we examined the properties of SI and SII in response to a motor task requiring reaching, grasping and manipulation, as well as the observation of the same actions. Furthermore, we functionally characterized this area with a set of clinical tests, including tactile, acoustical, and visual stimuli. The results showed that only SII activates both during execution and observation with a common temporal profile, whereas SI response were limited to execution. Together with their peculiar response to tactile stimuli, we conclude that the role of SII is pivotal also in the observation of actions involving haptic control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.