Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080275›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Electrophysiological and behavioural response of Philaenus spumarius to essential oils and aromatic plants.

Sonia Ganassi, Pasquale Cascone, Carmela Di Domenico, Marco Pistillo, Giorgio Formisano, Massimo Giorgini, Pasqualina Grazioso, Giacinto S Germinara, Antonio De Cristofaro, Emilio Guerrieri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Decade after the Outbreak ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sonia Ganassi *University of Molise, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Campobasso, 86100, Italy.
Pasquale Cascone *National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, Department of Biology, Agriculture and Food Sciences, Portici, Na, 80055, Italy.
Carmela Di DomenicoUniversity of Molise, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Campobasso, 86100, Italy.
Marco PistilloUniversity of Foggia, Department of the Sciences of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Foggia, 71122, Italy.
Giorgio FormisanoNational Research Council of Italy, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, Department of Biology, Agriculture and Food Sciences, Portici, Na, 80055, Italy.
Massimo GiorginiNational Research Council of Italy, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, Department of Biology, Agriculture and Food Sciences, Portici, Na, 80055, Italy.
Pasqualina GraziosoUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Life Sciences, Modena, 41125, Italy.
Giacinto S GerminaraUniversity of Foggia, Department of the Sciences of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Foggia, 71122, Italy.
Antonio De CristofaroUniversity of Molise, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Campobasso, 86100, Italy. decrist@unimol.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3207-9329
Emilio GuerrieriNational Research Council of Italy, Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection, Department of Biology, Agriculture and Food Sciences, Portici, Na, 80055, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0583-4667
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection · ITUniversity of Molise · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The meadow spittlebug, Philaenus spumarius, is a highly polyphagous widespread species, playing a major role in the transmission of the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa subspecies pauca, the agent of the "Olive Quick Decline Syndrome". Essential oils (EOs) are an important source of bio-active volatile compounds that could interfere with basic metabolic, biochemical, physiological, and behavioural functions of insects. Here, we report the electrophysiological and behavioural responses of adult P. spumarius towards some EOs and related plants. Electroantennographic tests demonstrated that the peripheral olfactory system of P. spumarius females and males perceives volatile organic compounds present in the EOs of Pelargonium graveolens, Cymbopogon nardus and Lavandula officinalis in a dose-dependent manner. In behavioral bioassays, evaluating the adult responses towards EOs and related plants, both at close (Y-tube) and long range (wind tunnel), males and females responded differently to the same odorant. Using EOs, a clear attraction was noted only for males towards lavender EO. Conversely, plants elicited responses that varied upon the plant species, testing device and adult sex. Both lavender and geranium repelled females at any distance range. On the contrary, males were attracted by geranium and repelled by citronella. Finally, at close distance, lavender and citronella were repellent for females and males, respectively. Our results contribute to the development of innovative tools and approaches, alternative to the use of synthetic pesticides, for the sustainable control of P. spumarius aiming to contrasting the expansion of X. fastidiosa.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalElectrophysiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacterial InfectionsBiological AssayFemaleHemipteraInsect RepellentsInsect VectorsMaleOdorantsOils, VolatilePlant DiseasesSmellVolatile Organic CompoundsXylellaInsect RepellentsOils, VolatileVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID32080275
PMCPMC7033279
OpenAlexW3008004177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.