Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080260›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Integrative taxonomy, biogeography and conservation of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) in Russia.

Ivan N Bolotov, Alexander V Kondakov, Ekaterina S Konopleva, Ilya V Vikhrev, Olga V Aksenova, Andrey S Aksenov, Yulia V Bespalaya, Alexey V Borovskoy, Petr P Danilov, Gennady A Dvoryankin and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Ivan N BolotovNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia. inepras@yandex.ru.
Alexander V KondakovNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Ekaterina S KonoplevaNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Ilya V VikhrevNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Olga V AksenovaNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Andrey S AksenovNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Yulia V BespalayaNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Alexey V BorovskoyFederal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Petr P DanilovScientific Research Institute of Applied Ecology of the North, M. K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Russia.
Gennady A DvoryankinFederal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Mikhail Y GofarovNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Mikhail B KabakovFederal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Olga K KlishkoInstitute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Chita, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4633-8395
Yulia S KolosovaNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Artem A LyubasNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Alexander P NovoselovFederal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Dmitry M PalatovA. N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Grigory N SavvinovScientific Research Institute of Applied Ecology of the North, M. K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Russia.
Nikolay M SolomonovScientific Research Institute of Applied Ecology of the North, M. K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk, Republic of Sakha (Yakutia), Russia.
Vitaly M SpitsynNorthern Arctic Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Svetlana E SokolovaFederal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Alena A TomilovaFederal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, Arkhangelsk, Russia.
Elsa FroufeCIIMAR/CIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Arthur E BoganResearch Laboratory, North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.
Manuel Lopes-LimaCIIMAR/CIMAR - Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Alexander A MakhrovLaboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Maxim V VinarskiLaboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater mussels are ecosystem engineers and keystone species in aquatic environments. Unfortunately, due to dramatic declines this fauna is among the most threatened globally. Here, we clarify the taxonomy and biogeography of Russian Unionidae species based on the most comprehensive multi-locus dataset sampled to date. We revise the distribution and assess the conservation status for each species. This fauna comprises 16 native species from 11 genera and 4 tribes: Anodonta, Pseudanodonta (Anodontini); Amuranodonta, Beringiana, Buldowskia, Cristaria, Sinanodonta (Cristariini); Middendorffinaia, Nodularia, Unio (Unionini); and Lanceolaria (Lanceolariini). No country-level endemic species are known in Russia, except for Buldowskia suifunica that may also occur in China. Sinanodonta woodiana, a non-native species, was introduced from China. Russia comprises the northern parts of Western and Eastern Palearctic subregions. The first subregion with six species encompasses a huge area from the western boundary of Russia to the Lena Basin in Siberia. The second subregion with 10 species covers the Amur Basin, rivers east of the Lena Basin, coastal basins of the Japan Sea, and the North Pacific Islands. The fauna of Russia primarily includes widespread generalist species that are here considered Least Concern (LC). However, Buldowskia suifunica and Sinanodonta lauta have restricted distributions and are assessed here as Vulnerable (VU) and Endangered (EN), respectively.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesPhylogeographyAnimalsAnimal ShellsBiodiversityBivalviaFresh WaterGenetic LociLikelihood FunctionsRussiaSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32080260
PMCPMC7033218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.