Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080212›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Combined HER3-EGFR score in triple-negative breast cancer provides prognostic and predictive significance superior to individual biomarkers.

Angela Ogden, Shristi Bhattarai, Bikram Sahoo, Nigel P Mongan, Mansour Alsaleem, Andrew R Green, Mohammed Aleskandarany, Ian O Ellis, Sonal Pattni, Xiaoxian Bill Li and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Angela OgdenDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Shristi BhattaraiDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bikram SahooDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nigel P MonganFaculty of Medicine and Health Science, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5438-1126
Mansour AlsaleemNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Andrew R GreenNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Mohammed AleskandaranyNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Ian O EllisNottingham Breast Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham Biodiscovery Institute, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Sonal PattniDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Xiaoxian Bill LiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Carlos S MorenoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5582-0028
Uma KrishnamurtiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Emiel A JanssenDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Kristin JonsdottirDepartment of Pathology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Emad RakhaFaculty of Medicine and Health Science, School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, LE12 5RD, UK.
Padmashree RidaNovazoi Theranostics, Inc., Rolling Hills Estates, CA, USA. cgp_rida@yahoo.com.
Ritu AnejaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. raneja@gsu.edu.
University of Nottingham · GBGeorgia State University · USEmory University · USStavanger University Hospital · NOTheranostics (New Zealand) · NZ

Funding

Evaluation of HSET as a Novel Theranostic Target for Breast Cancer TherapyR01CA169127 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Evaluation of centrosome amplification as a risk-predictor for breast cancer aggrU01CA179671 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Enhancing prognostic power of tumor grade by revisiting Ki67-mitosis relationshipR03CA188527 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2015 to 2016
$148k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169127NCI NIH HHS R03 CA188527NCI NIH HHS U01 CA179671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3) have been investigated as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) biomarkers. Reduced EGFR levels can be compensated by increases in HER3; thus, assaying EGFR and HER3 together may improve prognostic value. In a multi-institutional cohort of 510 TNBC patients, we analyzed the impact of HER3, EGFR, or combined HER3-EGFR protein expression in pre-treatment samples on breast cancer-specific and distant metastasis-free survival (BCSS and DMFS, respectively). A subset of 60 TNBC samples were RNA-sequenced using massive parallel sequencing. The combined HER3-EGFR score outperformed individual HER3 and EGFR scores, with high HER3-EGFR score independently predicting worse BCSS (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 2.30, p = 0.006) and DMFS (HR = 1.78, p = 0.041, respectively). TNBCs with high HER3-EGFR scores exhibited significantly suppressed ATM signaling and differential expression of a network predicted to be controlled by low TXN activity, resulting in activation of EGFR, PARP1, and caspases and inhibition of p53 and NFκB. Nuclear PARP1 protein levels were higher in HER3-EGFR-high TNBCs based on immunohistochemistry (p = 0.036). Assessing HER3 and EGFR protein expression in combination may identify which adjuvant chemotherapy-treated TNBC patients have a higher risk of treatment resistance and may benefit from a dual HER3-EGFR inhibitor and a PARP1 inhibitor.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksAdultAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesErbB ReceptorsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMammary Glands, HumanMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNF-kappa BPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1PrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanERBB3 protein, humanErbB ReceptorsNF-kappa BPARP1 protein, humanPoly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1Receptor, ErbB-3ThioredoxinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53TXN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID32080212
PMCPMC7033213
OpenAlexW3007352906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.