Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080141›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of POLE mutations in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ya He, Tian Wang, Na Li, Binkai Yang, Yuanjing Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Multisequence MRI-based radiomics model for predictingThe British journal of radiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ya HeGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University.
Tian WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Nankai University Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Na LiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Nankai University Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Binkai YangGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University.
Yuanjing HuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics, Nankai University Affiliated Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the clinicopathological features and to confirm prognostic value of POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDM) in endometrial carcinoma patients.

methodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, the data of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wan fang Medical Network were systematically searched for relevant articles without a cut-off date. The keywords for the search were "endometrial cancer," "endometrial carcinoma," "EC," "POLE mutations," "POLE exonuclease domain mutations," "POLE-mutant," "clinical characteristics" "prognostic." Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using Review manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0 statistical software.

resultsSix cohort studies assessing 179 EC patients with POLE EDMs were included. The results indicated a favorable progression-free survival in POLE-mutant patients (HR = 0.32; 95% CI: = [0.09-1.18]). Furthermore, the overall survival was great in patients with POLE-mutant (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = [0.41-1.13]). It was shown that a significantly higher incidence of POLE mutations with Federation of International of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) I group compared to FIGO II-IV group (pooled ORs: 0.34, 95% CI: [0.12-0.94], P = .04), POLE-mutant EC was not significantly associated with histology (OR = 0.56,95% CI: 0.29-1.23), tumor grade (OR = 1.22,95% CI:0.85-1.74), lymph-vascular space invasion (OR = 0.40,95% 0.06-2.42), depth of myometrial invasion (OR = 0.70,95% CI: 0.41-1.18), lymph node status (OR = 0.41, 95% 0.04-4.50), and European Society for Medical Oncology risk groups (OR = 0.68,95% CI: 0.37-1.26).

conclusionThis meta-analysis has confirmed POLE EDMs may serve as a predictive biomarker of favorable prognosis. Further studies are needed to explore the appropriate clinical utility of POLE EDMs in EC.

Indexed as

MutationBiomarkers, TumorDNA Polymerase IIEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymph NodesMyometriumNeoplasm InvasivenessPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalBiomarkers, TumorDNA Polymerase IIPOLE protein, humanPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32080141
PMCPMC7034748
OpenAlexW3006980656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.