SynthesisMedicine2020
Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic value of POLE mutations in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of the clinicopathologic features of endometrial cancer molecular staging.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Evaluation of the TCGA-Surrogate (ProMisE) Molecular Classification and Clinical Features of Endometrial Carcinoma: A Study of 97 Cases from China.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Unsolved Issues in the Integrated Histo-Molecular Classification of Endometrial Carcinoma and Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2024Review
- Article
- The Clinical and Pathological Characteristics of POLE-Mutated Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Cancer management and research · 2024Review
- Evaluating pretreatment serum CA-125 levels as prognostic biomarkers in endometrial cancer: a comprehensive meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Multisequence MRI-based radiomics model for predictingThe British journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Clinicopathological and molecular characterization of high-grade endometrial carcinoma with POLE mutation: a single center study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2022Article
- POLE, POLD1, and NTHL1: the last but not the least hereditary cancer-predisposing genes.Oncogene · 2021Review
- New Insights into Endometrial Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the clinicopathological features and to confirm prognostic value of POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDM) in endometrial carcinoma patients.
methodsThe PubMed, Web of Science, the data of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wan fang Medical Network were systematically searched for relevant articles without a cut-off date. The keywords for the search were "endometrial cancer," "endometrial carcinoma," "EC," "POLE mutations," "POLE exonuclease domain mutations," "POLE-mutant," "clinical characteristics" "prognostic." Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using Review manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0 statistical software.
resultsSix cohort studies assessing 179 EC patients with POLE EDMs were included. The results indicated a favorable progression-free survival in POLE-mutant patients (HR = 0.32; 95% CI: = [0.09-1.18]). Furthermore, the overall survival was great in patients with POLE-mutant (HR = 0.68; 95% CI = [0.41-1.13]). It was shown that a significantly higher incidence of POLE mutations with Federation of International of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) I group compared to FIGO II-IV group (pooled ORs: 0.34, 95% CI: [0.12-0.94], P = .04), POLE-mutant EC was not significantly associated with histology (OR = 0.56,95% CI: 0.29-1.23), tumor grade (OR = 1.22,95% CI:0.85-1.74), lymph-vascular space invasion (OR = 0.40,95% 0.06-2.42), depth of myometrial invasion (OR = 0.70,95% CI: 0.41-1.18), lymph node status (OR = 0.41, 95% 0.04-4.50), and European Society for Medical Oncology risk groups (OR = 0.68,95% CI: 0.37-1.26).
conclusionThis meta-analysis has confirmed POLE EDMs may serve as a predictive biomarker of favorable prognosis. Further studies are needed to explore the appropriate clinical utility of POLE EDMs in EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.