Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32080137›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Evaluation and validation of the prognostic value of nutrition and immunity parameters in gastric cancer after R0 resection.

Wenbo Xue, Xuezhong Xu, Yulin Tan, Yibo Wang, Hao Wang, Yixin Xu, Cheng Xi, Peng Jiang, Wei Ding

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Gender differences in systemic inflammatory and nutritional index following radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wenbo XueDepartment of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province.
Xuezhong XuDepartment of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province.
Yulin TanDepartment of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province.
Yibo WangDepartment of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province.
Hao WangThe Wujin Clinical college of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou.
Yixin XuDepartment of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province.
Cheng XiDepartment of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province.
Peng JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province.
Wei DingDepartment of General Surgery, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou, Jiangsu Province.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise predictive tools are critical for choosing the individualized treatment protocols and follow-up procedures for patients with gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate and validate the prognostic abilities of preoperative nutrition and immunity parameters in GC after curative R0 resection.We established two nomograms based on 437 patients who underwent curative radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer to predict the postoperative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), and then compared the predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomograms with the TNM stage systems for GC. An internal validation cohort of 141 patients and an external validation cohort of 116 patients were used to validate the result.The independent predictive factors for OS or RFS, including T stage, N stage, differentiated degree, neutrophil monocyte lymphocyte ratio (NMLR) and albumin globulin ratio (AGR) were used to establish the 2 nomograms. The C-index of the OS nomogram was 0.802, which was higher than that of the AGR, the NMLR and the TNM stage. The C-index of the RFS nomogram was 0.850, which was higher than that of the AGR, the NMLR and the TNM stage. Analogously, the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs, 0.920 for OS and 0.897 for RFS, respectively) of the two nomograms were higher than that of the NMLR, the AGR and the TNM stage. In the internal validation cohort, the C-indexes of the OS and RFS nomograms were 0.812 and 0.826, respectively. In the external validation cohort, the C-indexes of the OS and RFS nomograms were 0.866 and 0.880, respectively.The proposed nomograms including nutrition and immunity parameters were proved to have excellent predictive ability in survival and recurrence for patients with GC after R0 resection.

Indexed as

GastrectomyAgedCohort StudiesFemaleGlobulinsHumansLymphocytesMaleMonocytesNeutrophilsNomogramsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSerum AlbuminStomach NeoplasmsGlobulinsSerum Albumin

Identifiers

PMID32080137
PMCPMC7034686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.