ArticleMedicine2020
Evaluation and validation of the prognostic value of nutrition and immunity parameters in gastric cancer after R0 resection.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low Pretreatment Albumin-to-Globulin Ratio Predicts Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer: Insight From a Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Pooled it
- Elevated neutrophil-monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio increases risk of adverse outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Gender differences in systemic inflammatory and nutritional index following radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Article
- Combining nutritional status with TNM stage: a physiological update on gastric cancer staging for improving prognostic accuracy in elderly patients.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Survival Prediction Capabilities of Preoperative Inflammatory and Nutritional Status in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cardia cancer.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Geriatric nutritional risk index as a prognostic marker of pTNM-stage I and II esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after curative resection.Oncotarget · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise predictive tools are critical for choosing the individualized treatment protocols and follow-up procedures for patients with gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we aimed to evaluate and validate the prognostic abilities of preoperative nutrition and immunity parameters in GC after curative R0 resection.We established two nomograms based on 437 patients who underwent curative radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer to predict the postoperative overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), and then compared the predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomograms with the TNM stage systems for GC. An internal validation cohort of 141 patients and an external validation cohort of 116 patients were used to validate the result.The independent predictive factors for OS or RFS, including T stage, N stage, differentiated degree, neutrophil monocyte lymphocyte ratio (NMLR) and albumin globulin ratio (AGR) were used to establish the 2 nomograms. The C-index of the OS nomogram was 0.802, which was higher than that of the AGR, the NMLR and the TNM stage. The C-index of the RFS nomogram was 0.850, which was higher than that of the AGR, the NMLR and the TNM stage. Analogously, the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs, 0.920 for OS and 0.897 for RFS, respectively) of the two nomograms were higher than that of the NMLR, the AGR and the TNM stage. In the internal validation cohort, the C-indexes of the OS and RFS nomograms were 0.812 and 0.826, respectively. In the external validation cohort, the C-indexes of the OS and RFS nomograms were 0.866 and 0.880, respectively.The proposed nomograms including nutrition and immunity parameters were proved to have excellent predictive ability in survival and recurrence for patients with GC after R0 resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.